To Chris OC:
CHRIS OC said:
A question for all whites users ??? Which machine would work best for cellar hole hunting ???? Mxt's , v's ??? Opinions please , THANK YOU
My all-time favorite White's model for best versatility would be the MXT Pro/MXT All-Pro [size=small](same detector, just one with an 'All' sticker by the Pro and one without)[/size].
My all-time favorite search coil for this model [size=small](or the same
size for the MX5, M6, Classic ID and IDX Pro, 6000 Pro XL/XL Pro)[/size] is the 6½" diameter Concentric coil, That would be the 5.3 Eclipse for the MXT Pro's, M6 or MX5, or the Blue Max 600, 5.3 Black Max or 5,3 BullsEye for the other models I mentioned that work at 6.59 kHz.
To Hombre: As I have mentioned on many occasions, I DO like White's MX5, just not as much as the MXT Pro.
Generally, as in most-of-the-time, I didn't have any major issues with the MX5 for the bulk of my "typical coin hunting" in 'average' urban environments. I could also use the Teknetics Omega for urban Coin Hunting and, between then two of them, I actually preferred the Omega more 'in town.' due to audio Tone choices, but I liked the smaller round Concentric coil on the MX5 to the slightly under 5" diameter DD for the Omega.
In more challenging ground environments, I liked the Omega a little better because it had a fast automated GB that was then set or fixed where I wanted it, AND I had the manual GB over-ride to tweak it, either way. Having a 'Lock Trac' option or a manual GB option gave me an advantage over the MX5.
Consider these statements:
From a V3i Manual:
Inhibit - ON (“X” in box) When on, delays the point automatic tracking begins to
adjust to the ground.
Helps in iron infested ground. Use off in widely variable ground
with little or no iron to allow immediate tracking.
... The MX5 doesn't offer a Trac Inhibit Off function;
Offset -
Manually moves ground balance point from perfect balance. Positive offset
often used in highly mineralized ground to enhance low conductive and small (gold,
silver, coins) targets in radically changing noisy ground.... The MX5 doesn't provide this option. What I use now gives me the ability to manually GB with a slightly positive offset, if I desire.
Locktrac -
Locks ground setting. Turns off all tracking. Turn ON and use manual
method above. Best used for repeatable responses on very deep targets, and rejection
of difficult minerals.... Nope, not on the MX5, and I hunt sites with a very high Ground Phase and usually 5-of-8 to 7-of-8 Fe3O4 [size=small](Magnetic Mineral Indication display)[/size] segments filled in, plus some sites that produce deeper coins and keepers plus some ferrous junk.
Inhibit –
When ON ground mineral tracking is restricted during target signals that have a high
probability of being a ground mineral or hot rock. Doing so prevents errors in ground tracking caused by ground
anomalies in search area. When off (empty square) ground tracking occurs regardless. ON is suggested for most
types of searching. OFF is suggested for Prospecting.
... No 'Inhibit' with the MX5 to select On or Off, and that means without it I could have/and have had troubles due to tracking errors in many of my bad-ground search areas.
MX5 Manual
It is possible to largely null out the ground signal and leave
only target signals. This is done with a combination of special
tuning in the receiver plus filters. The tuning portion is what we
call ground balance. Some detectors have a fixed (preset)
ground balance which is optimal for one type of mineralization;
in other types of ground it may not be optimal and will result in
loss of depth. The MX5 has a variable ground balance with the
ability to automatically track changes in soil mineralization.
This system (called AutoTrac®) keeps the MX5 tuned for optimal
performance in most ground conditions and results in better
detection depth.
Most ferrous mineralization produces a response with a
VDI of -93 (for pure ferrite) up to perhaps -88 or so. This is at
the extreme end of the ferrous (iron) region. Most small iron
targets (nails and so forth) reside in the middle of the ferrous
region. To prevent tracking to iron targets the AutoTrac® system
has an upper limit on the track range of -88 (VDI). Sometimes
we draw the VDI scale as a semicircle, with ferrous (-95 to 0)
on the left and non-ferrous (0 to +95) on the right; we can use
this to show the normal range of ground tracking:
Because the track range now includes the entire ferrous
region, it is possible for iron targets to cause tracking errors.
Therefore, if a target gives an initial response and then quickly
fades away on subsequent short sweeps, it is likely an iron target.
Using Pinpoint mode will lock tracking and allow you to
zero in on the target. You may first need to move off the target
and bob the coil a couple of times to re-establish a correct
ground balance point, then switch to Pinpoint mode.... And most places I hunt have bad ground and an over-abundance of iron/ferrous targets, and it is possible, for tracking errors, and it does happen.
XLT Manual:
AUTO-TRAC™ is recommended for typical search conditions.
If, however, a great deal of decomposed
man-made iron is encountered, AUTO TRAC™
OFF, is advised.... But the MX5 doesn't allow the operator to turn Auto-Trac™ 'Off' when I hunt especially iron trashy ghost towns, homesteads, and other locations with frequent ferrous trash.
So, while I like the MX5 and it does work okay for most typical Coin Hunting sites in town,. I had to make a choice as I sold off a lot of excess detectors I have to trim my detector arsenal down, and I kept the models that performed the best for me on the Nail Board Performance Test, dense iron plagued sites, urban coin hunting locations, rural relic hunting sites, beach h8nting my local freshwater sandy site, and being able to handle all the more challenging ground I encountered.
It almost matched my MXT Pro's performance, but the MXT Pro had a definite edge, to include the ability to 'Lock' the GB setting. It also didn't match the performance I get with my Nokta FORS CoRe or Makro Racer, or even the Bandido II µMAX in dense iron challenged sites. Thus, I made the decision I felt I needed to with my MX5. Very good detector, not a bad one, but I also considered the poor location of the headphone jack and lack of Lock Trac ability and sold it off.
To Oregon Gregg: Yes, we ALL get to use the detectors we prefer and just need to appreciate they are not 'perfect' in overall performance and looks, they just happen to be what we like and perform to our satisfaction.
To Anyone interested in a get-away and a chance find some old stuff and meet others: We are having a "Welcome to Hunt" metal detecting outing on May 16th & 17th, plus as many days after as you would care to hang around. Meet others from new-comers, to beginners, experienced, and maybe even a 'pro' or two. Our 'base camp' will be Wendover, Nevada. Some, like me, will stay at Motel 6, some at another motel, some at a casino resort, and others might use an RV park.
We'll discuss the different sites, figure out how many are there to participate and make destination plans the evening of the 15th, then head out for a full-day of enjoyment on Saturday the 16th. Just show up and figure out how you want to stay there, enjoy what the different casinos offer, and shop for some food and beverages to be ready for a few days of old site hunting. At least four old town sites are on the agenda, and if we can, we'll add more places. They date back to an activity period beginning 1868 and 1869 for the two oldest town site.
So of you're bored, want a new and different place to hunt, would like an opportunity to fine older coins such as half-dimes, 3¢ and 2¢ pieces, Seated Liberty and Barber silv3eer coins, Indian Head or Flying Eagle cents, old 'Good For' Trade Tokens, and best of all to learn more about your detectors and to meet other folks who enjoy this great outdoor sport .... here's an opportunity. If interested, just e-mail me at: monte@ahrps.org and I'll put you on the e-mail list of info I am sending out.
Monte