Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Which is better Quattro or GT and why?

I had a Sov for about 3 hours one time, bought it off E@@ and put it back in the box and put it back on E@@. At least I got my $$$$ Back on it. So, I don't know about depth between the two. The Safari is a updated version of the Quattro and either one would be better than the Sov as far as the nulling and flute music, plus you have a few more freq to help out, 28 vs 17. The Safari runs great in my high mineralized ground.............Mark
 
Got both.

with absolutely no doubts, the Sovereign has proven to me to be mor versatile, lighter and deeper than the Quattro.

Don't get me wrong, the Q isn't bad at all, just darn heavy and too...uh...automatic.

I like the disc better on the Sovereign, you can cherry pick deeper than with other detectors.

The reverse disc technique I learnt on this forum is deeper than my Quattro in any setting.

The battery pack system of the Sovereign is very efficient.

HH
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top