Tex, I had 2 days to find relics in over 600 acres and happened to luck into a spot that contained some. The targets I got that were no deeper than 3" came up with no problem. ALL other relics I dug were 12-14". Nothing in between. I may have gotten those 3 targets with the shooter, if I had been able to get to them in time. I was battling a huge area, bad ground and 159 other guys with metal detectors. I know for a fact, as Rob and Larry attest, that the shooter would never have touched the deep targets I dug. If my depth showed 3" or less and I didn't get a discrimination tone, I didn't dig. Anything deeper than that came out of the ground. The best education I could get in this ground was doing, not being told. I had originally made the sad mistake that other guys seem to be making. I assumed the ground couldn't be as bad as I had been told. I got a rude awakening that I believe anyone else would as well when there coil hit the orange ground in VA. I was wise enough to ask a few questions to those that had been there ahead of me getting a bit of advice instead of armchair detecting and thinking I had the answers.
I do realize that, for shallower targets, the smaller coil is much better than a large in bad ground. It deals with the reflectivity of the ground, the output from the coil, etc. This is elementary. I learned that a few years ago when I had my XLT and watched the videos that Whites produced with suggestions to turn of tx boost in bad ground.
I appreciate any advice that I am given and will never turn away anyone offering up that advice. But, I do ask to be respected for my experience as well.
I am curious to know one thing. A few months back you gave this advice
texasranger said:
choose a single frequency for the class of target sought after.
yet you asked why I ran a single frequency instead of using three?