You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
[size=medium]Many hobbyists, especially those newer to the hobby, have never experienced the challenges of hunting in a TR-Disc. mode. They increase as the ground mineralization gets worse, and since they are not compensating for the ground when set to reject unwanted trash, hey are much 'squirrellier' to operate. Thus, most users will just stick to the GEB-Disc. motion mode for ease or operation. Even many (most really) knowledgeable detectorists with a lot of time under their belt and experience with those earlier type models, just don't care to use TR-Disc. because the GEB-Disc. works so well in the majority of sites they will hunt.[/size]Bowie said:Ive never used mine,not even experimented.
[size=medium]Well, there really isn't that much to talk about, other than to explain the basic differences between a 'conventional' TR-Disc. mode and motion-based GEB-Disc.Bowie said:I am hoping you and digger could further talk about that mode.
[size=medium]The 950 coil, especially the newer body style which adds a nice visual touch, makes a great pop cup holder. When affixed to some plastic 'legs' it sort of resembles a spacecraft and a 32 oz. or 44 oz. beverage cup is held nicely. it lakes a great attention getter while being functional on a desk or table. Heck, I can even run the coil cable toward the back of my computer or towards a wall outlet and tell folks that it can keep my beverage chilled or heated.Bowie said:I dont have the small snooper coil either. I have the 5.3,8 and 9.5. Would one of those be as effective as the snooper coil while in TR Disc?
[size=medium]The fact that our modern motion-based discriminators are not a "true progressive" type does cause some iron/.magnetic based targets to 'false' and not be cleanly rejected (such as the old-style crimp-on bottle caps), A true TR-Disc. model doesn't have this type of target falsing. But TR and TR-Disc. models had other response issues as I'll note later.[/size]Bowie said:As you were explaining the progressive TR Disc, you stated the modern motion Disc had problems with some iron and magnetic targets, Is this the falsing we/I encounter? Does the TR Disc have falsing issues??
[size=medium]Here is where operating a conventional TR or TR-Disc. model can be a challenge, especially as the ground mineral conditions increase! A conventional TR detector, or a TR-Disc. model being operated with enough rejection (discrimination) to deal with iron nails and bottle caps, must be operated with the search coil maintaining a very consistent coil-to-ground relationship.Bowie said:When you spoke of using TR Disc on level ground,it made me think when I hunted with my Dad years back. I dont recall what detector model, but it was a Whites, I had to sweep the ground with the coil just hovering above the ground, he told me I couldnt let it touch the ground, it was hard at first,lol. I still catch myself doing that but not much.