earthmansurfer
Active member
I came across an 8" coin and got it on video, only 3 1/2 minutes long. Very good hit but you still could observe some differences in the settings (volume gain at 23 btw). Yeah, it was from a 500 year old hunted out spot.
My deepest "good hit" coin on the E-Trac was 9". Judging by how good this hit at 8" and since I could raise the coil another 3" or 4" above the ground, I have a feeling the CTX will go deeper in my somewhat iron mineralized ground.
I compared the following settings/modes:
50 Conductive Vs. Combine
Ferrous Coin Vs. High Trash
Recovery Fast On Vs. Off
Sensitivity Vs. Manual
* I have to say, if you haven't tried Recovery Fast On, I recommend trying it. The sound is not really clipped like on the E-Trac and the VID #'s do not really appear much less stable (just slightly). But, in testing, it does appear to give a noticeable improvement in separation/unmasking. Not sure about it's affect, if any, on depth. Where as on the E-Trac I ran it off, I have been running it on, on the CTX.
I've moved my minimal disc pattern out from just the lower right to the second vertical line from the left, if you can see. Seems to do the trick now.
Another thing, notice how a hot manual sensitivity possibly affected the targets VID stability. Or is the machine tracking to the target and calming down? (Thanks for that mention Gazza209)
Please post if you noticed anything in the video, recommendations, etc., as I'm wondering as well about the CTX.
Thanks,
Albert
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkbnVtyvyx8[/video]
My deepest "good hit" coin on the E-Trac was 9". Judging by how good this hit at 8" and since I could raise the coil another 3" or 4" above the ground, I have a feeling the CTX will go deeper in my somewhat iron mineralized ground.
I compared the following settings/modes:
50 Conductive Vs. Combine
Ferrous Coin Vs. High Trash
Recovery Fast On Vs. Off
Sensitivity Vs. Manual
* I have to say, if you haven't tried Recovery Fast On, I recommend trying it. The sound is not really clipped like on the E-Trac and the VID #'s do not really appear much less stable (just slightly). But, in testing, it does appear to give a noticeable improvement in separation/unmasking. Not sure about it's affect, if any, on depth. Where as on the E-Trac I ran it off, I have been running it on, on the CTX.
I've moved my minimal disc pattern out from just the lower right to the second vertical line from the left, if you can see. Seems to do the trick now.
Another thing, notice how a hot manual sensitivity possibly affected the targets VID stability. Or is the machine tracking to the target and calming down? (Thanks for that mention Gazza209)
Please post if you noticed anything in the video, recommendations, etc., as I'm wondering as well about the CTX.
Thanks,
Albert
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkbnVtyvyx8[/video]