Keep two detectors in your arsenal.
skateteacher said:
I'm thinking of upgrading to a single machine.
Over the past 48 years of detecting I have tried that several times. It was easy to be satisfied, back about '68 thru '73 or so, but when detector advancement started happening quickly and we had a lot more to choose from, I found that two detectors was a minimum I needed to have around. Just too many variables that we might encounter so I wanted to have enough versatility and function.
Sticking with White's models as of the latter '90s to early '2000's I could be quite satisfied with the likes of an XLT and Classic ID or an XL Pro and IDX Pro. One complimented the other. I also remembered to have the best coil mounted, or at-the-ready, for a variety of hunts as well.
skateteacher said:
I have an MXT 300 for the dirt/dry sand and a Dual Field for the water.
That's a good combination for many people. Personally, I am not a big PI fan, nor do I work out into the surf when I go to the coast. I like to work the dry sand and the wet sand at minus tide. The MXT 300 (for readers who don't know) is simply a basic or standard MXT that came with the 300mm, aka 12", round concentric search coil. I am a fan of any MXT, preferring the now top-end MXT Pro.
skateteacher said:
I thought I would spend more time actually in the water(SoCal surf) but I have found that I like detecting the wet sand and dry better as being out in the surf doesn't suit my style.
That's my style, work the beaches but not out into the water. Just not for me (since I can't swim).
skateteacher said:
So my question is would you rather have a V3/V3i as single machine for wet/dry sand and dirt than two machines an MXT and Dual Field?
I would rather have two detectors, and if I narrowed it down from the White's line-up, which I have, it results in these two: An MXT Pro w/6