Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

:usaflag: Infinium or Dual Field?? My Experiences------------:detecting:

Cupajo

Active member
I have owned and used both of these fine machines and am one of a few people in the position to be able to answer that question.

In '08 I purchased a Garrett's Infinium LS and hit the water running. Like most new LS owners I had a tough time dealing with the "learning curve" so often talked about with this machine.

The primary issues are its amazing sensitivity and having to manually ground ballance the detector.

After a few hunts I was able to start making sense of what the macine was telling me and started to find gold rings. The LS is a chatty machine that constantly emmits little chirps of sound as it is swung from sided to side. As someone who is sensitive to sounds, I had a problem with that, but managed to live with it, because I was finding gold!

I learned to think of these sounds as, "Infinium's happily talking to itself while it was finding gold for me."

I had to send it to Garrett's twice during the short time I owned it, once only days after I bought it and later, just before I sold it.I had several coils for the machine, my favorite being the 8"Mono.

It is heavier than the DF, needs constant tweaking of controls where I hunt and is chatty, all of which I had a problem with.

Another issue was its being so upset every time a plane, train or boat passed within a mile of where I hunted. Several times during a hunt I would have to be annoyed be this interference and would need to adjust the signal frequency of the LS to be able to continue hunting.

What made this a real problem was hunting in a place where all of these radio signals are very common and fairly constant.

In spite of all these negatives, I learned to really like the LS and in a couple of years of use found enough gold to pay for the machine and to assure me that even if I ever found a machine that better suited my needs I would keep the LS as back-up, even though I still have my two beloved old XL-500 PIs waiting in the wings if needed.

Enter the Dual Field.

I had been reading Craig's posts and listening to others including Clive for a while about this machine and decided to try one out and learn what all the talk was about.

It has been one of my better metal detecting decisions!

The machine is light weight, easy to use and has an amazing battery life!!

It has many more hours on it now than the LS and has never been returned to White's!

There is a pleasant, constant threshold tone that doesn't annoy me with chatter and even though it responds to passing trains etc., like most if not all PI machines, it isn't so bad that I am greatly bothered by it.

The icing on the cake is that the DF finds gold!!!!!!!!!

It, like my LS, has payed for itself several times over and continues to be my tool of choice when I water hunt.

The automatic ground ballance is a blessing where I hunt and the DF has none of the annoying features that were a constant bother with the LS.

In all fairness to the Infinium, it is a specialized machine with a broad range of uses.

It just didn't fit my needs as well as the DF.

After learning for myself what the DF was all about I decided I would sell the Infinium and buy a Sovereign GT so I could learn what that machine is all about and it may take me a while, because I am primarilly a water hunter and prefer PI machines.

Now my Hunting Friends, I hope this helps you to know more about the Infinium and the Dual Field.

GL&HH Fellow Hunters,

CJ
 
Good review CJ.
When I was in the market for a PI the dual field
had just come on the scene.
At the time its was a choice of a few models.
I eventually settled for the Detector Pro HH PI.
Very deep machine with all the controls in the
earphones.
I got it with the 11 inch coil would like to eventually
pick up the 8 inch.
I use it in freshwater usually after I've exhausted
the search with the VLF waterproof machine.
 
Nice review Cj..enjoyed the review as a DF and a LS owner..I hoping once I retire I can give the same amount of time to each ..thanks for sharing
 
I used to love the threshhold hum of my Whites Eagle, BUT now that I dive, I love the silence of my Fisher. I am in such shallow water most the time I HAVE to hear boats and jet skiis. So I wouldn't like either maching from what you have posted.

I was thinking of trying one in a fresh water lake. I know the cons of finding every piece of metal, BUT I also know its worth it to keep digging.

So far 2 boaters have tried to steal my flag and I have got hit in my tank with the keel of a snailboat. I do hear most but some sneak within range. Last thing I would need is more distraction!!

Thanks so much for the information.
 
One thing you may want to keep in mind is that most detectors will preform satisfactorily with no threshold signal. Adjust for "normal" operation and tweak the knob down for silent running.

Very little if any depth is lost with most machines and a solid signal will not be missed.

I don't know if anyone has bothered to research loss of depth related to this, but I would be surprised if it was ever a problem underwater.

Something worth considering,

CJ
 
Thanks for the in depth evaluation. I am still curious about the Dual Field. I struggled mightily trying to make up my mind whether to buy the Dual Field or the Head Hunter PI. I eventually bought the HHPI & bought both of the interchangeable coils. I bought it primarily due to the extreme light weight as well as the controls in the headphones.I hunt primarily in freshwater in Minnesota,but plan to bring it to Florida in January. I have bought all of Clives books even the Dual Field ones because of the wealth of good infromation. Take care!
 
rarysgaard said:
Thanks for the in depth evaluation. I am still curious about the Dual Field. I struggled mightily trying to make up my mind whether to buy the Dual Field or the Head Hunter PI. I eventually bought the HHPI & bought both of the interchangeable coils. I bought it primarily due to the extreme light weight as well as the controls in the headphones.I hunt primarily in freshwater in Minnesota,but plan to bring it to Florida in January. I have bought all of Clives books even the Dual Field ones because of the wealth of good infromation. Take care!


Your Headhunter is just as deep as the DF, my hunting partner swings the HHer or did until he sold it for the DF... the only a couple advantages the DF had over the HHer was pinpointing is much easier and you can take it deeper.
 
Battery usage also Craig. I had a HH PI with the larger coil and averaged about 8hours of run time on a new set of duracell alkalines. I like the thinner non buoyant coil of the HH PI though, thats a sweet coil.
 
So the threshold can be turned to non existant on both machines? There is NO way I could try either machine on most of my drop offs BUT I have a lake that is void of most all signals for my VLF machine. I have found deep deep coins and rings but I know if I would have not had my machine right over them I would have missed them. Even an inch off the center of the coil, they were that deep. I have pulled over 10 grand of gold out of this lake also and want to get the deepest possible. Would love to try either one without having to dig in my pocket but, LOL wishful thinking!!

Thanks for the info. I am talking about 3 - 6' of water and I really need silence!! Some people tell me to wade , but I love the no distractions of laying on the bottom and concentrating on my swing and targets
 
Neil said:
Battery usage also Craig. I had a HH PI with the larger coil and averaged about 8hours of run time on a new set of duracell alkalines. I like the thinner non buoyant coil of the HH PI though, thats a sweet coil.

I started with the HHer and forgot about how it loved batteries... :)
 
So the threshold can be turned to non existant on both machines?

Yes,but------------unless you test for depth or can find someone who has done so, I don't know how depth is affected by running silent.

It's easy enough to be sure the detector is working, but I would hate to cover even a yard or two and then discover my machine wasn't working.(The main reason I wouldn't run with no threshold.)

Regards,

CJ
 
Top