In my opinion, no I don't think you are at a real disadvantage based on availability of a ID number.
The CZ3d actually has 7 bands of displayed conductivity ranges, from iron up to silver. Not specific ID numbers but they indicate ranges. If you read enough on the various forums about results with the numeric IDs, even the most consistent detectors still can vary the ID number of specific targets a good bit. Some variation can be based on depth, ground mineralization, orientation of target (on edge, flat, slanted, bent) and sometimes a lot of variation comes if it is very near another target of different conductivity such as silver dime next to piece of iron.
I get in trouble when I start relying on a target ID of any kind and don't dig every thing that hasn't been positively noted to be iron or a soda can. If you are relic hunting, you may want to dig much of the iron too. My most productive hunting has actually been with detectors that do not have target ID except for what can be determined with the discrimination setting.
The success is entirely operator driven. My opinion is that if you learn the strengths and weaknesses of the particular detector you are using, you can be very successful with any reasonably good detector. I think any CZ and certainly the CZ3D is more than just reasonably good. I have an older CZ and it can certainly produce. I think it's biggest short fall is recovery speed. In relatively clean hunting environments it is not much of an issue. In trashy environments the slower circuit recovery speed can be mitigated by swinging slower, working slower and / or using a small coil.
How you hunt and how well you learn the detector can make a larger difference than getting a detector that can give you a specific ID number.
... my 2 cents.
Cheers,
tvr