Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

This could get expensive!

Scottowl

Member
I set out a few weeks ago to learn about replacing my old dinasaur camera.

My eyes were opened up to the world of dslr cameras. After getting over the sticker shock of these critters, and almost talking myself into making the plunge, I get reading on the internet that the lenses that come with the Rebel XT and Nikon D50 are not worth hauling to the dump, and that a good lens is a must. Some of these lenses are more than the camera body of these models!

So, I'm back with a few more questions (you said I could!) What I hope to accomplish is good photos of bright lights at night, scenic panoramas, decent macro, and passable capabilities with things in motion. In that order.

1) Are the lenses that come with these particular models that bad?

2) Olympus has a good deal on their E500 and 2 lenses right now. Are these lenses better than the Canon or Nikon kits? I have not been able to find any objective reviews of them online.

3) All three of the models I have mentioned have upgraded versions new to the market, with some useful features. The Nikon and Canon have self cleaning image sensors and more pixels, the Olympus has image stabilization. I can see where these respective features may be worth 100-200$ more. How long would I have to wait until the next "latest-greatest" thing comes out, so I could get todays best at a discount?

My hobby this winter is going to be researching cameras, and learning Photoshop Elements. Can anyomne suggest a good book on Photoshop for Morons?

I plan on hitting the libary for a few books on photography basics, and learning my f stop from my ISO, and how to apply some knowledge. I want to make sure I can make some informed decisions when the time does come to get a new camera.
 
Scottowl:

I have the Olympus E-500 and like it a lot. As with other Digital SLR's, don't expect a razor sharp image straight out of the camera. You must manipulate the image somewhat to derive full advantage of it.

The E-500 does not have an image stabilization system. It does have a self cleaning sensor, something that other cameras lack.

Don't think you have to get a Digital SLR. If you're not willing to spend a lot of time in your digital darkroom, then a regular digital camera may suit you better. The Panasonic FZ series with its ultra zoom and stabilized lens is one of my favorites.

The bottom line is that you need to figure out what you want to do and then start looking.

You asked if the E500 kit lenses are better? I can say that at least regarding the Canon kit lens (17-55) the Olympus kit lenses are better.
 
" As with other Digital SLR's, don't expect a razor sharp image straight out of the camera."

Whaddya mean John? Have Tom/Cocoa and RM been dolling up fuzzy shots and passing them off as real pichers? Heck, I was nearly ready to buy a D70 and a Bigma. HH
 
Using good lenses will go a long way to improve sharpness with a DSLR. However, the nature of the beast mandates that some sharpening be applied to photos, especially when resizing.

Point and Shoot cameras have a lot of sharpening applied in-camera.
 
Sorry buddy.
Lets not put false information out this board please.



Thank you,
Rick Martin
 
As far as I know, all the information I posted is common knowledge.
 
Top