was exactly the response I was hoping for! I hope nobody thought I was trying to bash the Ace 250 or Garrett in general.
I should perhaps explain that I took the Ace 250 to some '60s athletic fields and I detected for a little over an hour. Besides a nickel that I eyeballed, found only a zinc & a clad dime, both 1" deep & thought "I can't remember ever doing this bad here".
I know this was a pretty short test & only at one place, essentially cleaned out on my previous few hundred visits there. Still I sensed that wasn't the entire explanation. I thought about it awhile & think I have the answer.
I'm used to detecting with my White's MXT with the DD coil that's essentially the same size as the coil on the Ace 250. But the wide scanning DD coil is probably able to cover much more ground in the same amount of time as the non-DD Ace 250 coil. Mystery solved, I think.
So now the question is what to do with the Ace 250. I guess I will experiment some more with planted coins to determine if I can sweep it really fast without losing much depth or ID accuracy. If it passes that test, OK I'll try again. If not I may just put it in the closet until Garrett has a DD this size or larger, or a larger non-DD. But I also want to do a test to see if the Ace 250 can get a probable coin ID deeper than the MXT.
I agree the Ace 250 is very good for the price, but for covering much acreage with low trash & few coins, I really do need a different coil. Anyone have any news from Garrett about a bigger coil? HH, George (MN)