Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

The BEST , and DEEPEST detector, I found it!!!!

scubadetector

New member
THIS has been asked on EVERY forum and MAYBE before it has to be answered again, an answer can be stuck somewhere so EVERYONE can refer the person that asked to a post such as this. I am thinking that the experienced users could all chip in to an answer, and ALL the people that ask on ANY FORUM, can be redirected to an answer they can understand. SO I am taking my time to TRY to explain WHY its impossible to answer.

Soil mineralization and content vary so widely its impossible to make a detector that handles the same way in all the soil combinations it will encounter. The soil moisture, the effects of the surrounding metal on the object your after and the ability to get your coil as close to the ground as possible ALL contribute to finding a target.

Detector variables..... Coil size, coil composition and type, detector settings, ground balance, transmit power, receive power, circuitry, distance from coil to surface of ground. Ability to separate targets, Ability to perform in any ground mineralization, machine frequency

Ground variables..... Mineralization, moisture content, soil composition, obstacles, flatness

Target variables....... orientation (one edge, tilted) target size, target composition, target mask, length target has been in ground,

User variables......... Knowledge of machine, distance of machine to ground, CONCENTRATION, swing pattern, speed of swing,


I am POSITIVE I missed some variables, Please everyone help fill this in.

I don't want this to be a post that ends up where people say this machine does better at this and that. NO machine is right for every user or every situation so lets leave BRANDS ad MODELS completely OUT of this post.

MY aim at this post is for us experienced users to NOT sound RUDE to newcomers that want our advice.


Why do we ALL miss targets, AGAIN, a lot of that has to do with WAY, WAY to many variables so there is NO one answer. How far is your coil above the ground at ALL points in your swing, Did you set your machine up to its best capabilities? Is the ground at its ideal moisture consistency, How fast are we moving the coil ahead. Are we concentrating on what we are doing.

You are told to overlap your swings by 50%. You will for sure miss targets if you do that. Plain and simple. If you have a 8" coil and you move it 4 inches and at the deepest your detector reads is a point that is only the size of lets say a dime, you missed detecting at least 3 inches of ground. You should only be moving your detector half an inch each swing to cover all the ground. AND you also have to make sure your coil stays EXACTLY the same distance from the ground for the WHOLE arch of your swing, so you need perfectly flat ground. LOL impossible.

Another HUGE variable is what angle you come across the target, especially one that is masked. Hit it one way no signal, move all around it in a 360 degree circle you will sometimes hear good solid signals and sometimes hear iffy signals.

If the powers that be like this, and the experienced users contribute, I am thinking WE as a UNITED EXPERIENCED group can help the newcomers understand why this isn't an exact science without sounding rude or demeaning to them.

We all have our knowledge, our detector of choice, our COMMITMENT and DEDICATION to the hobby we enjoy, lets unite here to help others understand what we face out there!!

And I would HOPE that if enough of us experienced users would contribute, the powers that be would make this a sticky and show the author as EXPERIENCED USERS or something like that.


Just remember, the water in Michigan is the wrong consistency for diving or wading and no detectors will work in it. Its also way to wet to detect in. And since everybody who swam in the 11 thousand lakes knew better to remove their coins and jewelry before they went swimming, there is nothing to be found. So detecting Michigan water would be wasting your money and time. And I would hate for anybody to do that.


(Ok my last statment could be removed in a final modification of this post!!)
 
How about tolerance to junk? Because ........ heck ...... everyone knows there's now some nugget machines that can pick up a coin at nearly 2 ft. deep, right? But sheessskkk, you'd go plumb crazy trying to use a nugget machine in most any turf or relicky site. Every single staple or birdshot would blow your ears off, with utterly no way to distinguish anything.

So anytime someone asks what the deepest machine is, simply tell them to go get one of the new-fangled Minelab nugget machine, and tell them to take it to the nearest inner city turfed urban park, and turn them loose. Gauranteed "they won't miss a thing" and gauranteed: "they'll go deeeeeppp"! haha
 
AGAIN, I don't want ANY brand specifics in this post!! And I was thinking of getting a new GPX5000 for my local parks!!

http://s81.photobucket.com/albums/j234/robertg_g/?action=view&current=Dailymotion-MrBean-Makingametaldetector-aFunnyvideo.mp4
 
I think it's better to not filter out any metals, especially while relic hunting, because if there's an iron chest hidden under you, full of gold, you'll pass right over it and still go home broke again...
:pulltab:
 
Another variable to consider is EMI. Some machines seem to handle it better then others. Depending on where you hunt it could be a non issue or a big issue. Several of the older parks I hunt have power lines that make trouble if your detector can't deal with it.
 
Location. You can't find it or blame any metal detector if it's not there. Which would lead to my next one- :paraysis through Analysis". Have FUN!
 
scubadetector said:
I am POSITIVE I missed some variables, Please everyone help fill this in.

Location Variables: A school that was built 5 years ago probably isn't as good a place to look for silver coins as a house that was built 50 or a hundred years ago. At the same time a 80 acre farmers field probably will not produce much for the coin shooter but could be great for the relic hunter if there was a civil war camp or something there in the past. Coin shooters probably want to frequent soccer and foot ball fields after big events.

On second thought maybe I should have titled it Research Variables since it is important to know something about the history of the property you want to hunt.

Jerry
 
They tear down houses that have been around for a hundred years to build schools sometimes. The ground everywhere has been around since the world was made. Research will tell you what was there before the school.

My friend and I stumbled upon a pre civil war camp almost for sure. LOL we were just romping in the woods with our detectors. BUT research does play a great part in finding things. Even if your the best with your detector IF its not there your not going to find it!!

Thank you
 
Sink Rate of targets
Type of detecting ( coins, relics, gold, etc...)
Physical disabilities ( hearing, eyesight, bad back, etc...)
Age of the site
 
AND that is one of the BEST reasons that the detector they use is NOT the detector you should get. Its just like when somebody asks what is the best water detector!! TOO many variables. So they find the one people say is best and get a price on a good used one. Dive with it to 40' and it dies. Well nobody told me it was only waterproof to 5'.

That is the the MAIN reason for this post. Nothing is good in all areas and in all circumstances. I swear by my machine. BUT it does what I need it to do, in the area I do it in and I know most the time what it is telling me. Is there a better one? Maybe, and maybe not. I am happy and I won't shell out another grand and start a new learning curve to see.

I am happy with what I have and I am happy with the results. All the hype is just that to me.

Ask people in YOUR area what seems to work, know the machines capabilites and limitations and ENJOY IT. Coming here to ANY forum and asking what the best machine is , is like going to a Honda dealer and asking what the best kind of car is.

You will only get what the person knows who is using it and you will not get ANY accurate comparison test or knowledge about your area.
 
scubadetector said:
Ask people in YOUR area what seems to work, know the machines capabilites and limitations and ENJOY IT. Coming here to ANY forum and asking what the best machine is , is like going to a Honda dealer and asking what the best kind of car is.

You will only get what the person knows who is using it and you will not get ANY accurate comparison test or knowledge about your area.

Very true, but asking locals means talking to club guys. Funny thing the guys in my club are very short on the subject of the detectors they own. All they say is I have a lot of detectors, and use one depending on the situation. That true to a point, but they have a water detector, a totlot detect, a relic detector, and a coin shooter that they go to, and 20 that just collect dust because they are too old. They know you want to know what they think the best coinshooter is for mineralized soil, but they don't want you to know their secret. Guess you have to get to know them, by then you will just know what works anyway.

Asking of the forums eventually gets you a local, but on findmall you pretty much have to ask in each manufacturers forum, and because since people here almost never post their location, searches don't help much and you are spit out of luck.
 
Scuba is correct. Location (mineralization) & type of hunting needs to be known in order for a reasonable answer to be offered to this posting question. I live in the Boise, ID area. I like the First Texas machines (using Omega) for their price point/mineralization capabilities. But for turf hunting the E-Trac rules supreme in our mineralized soil for coinhunting. The 4 guys I have hunted with all own this unit. It reigns supreme for deep silver. Kicked my T2's backside when I owned one. However, their Trac's ran $1300.00, my Omega, less than $600.00, and I get about 85% of the Trac's performance and some other benefits the Trac cannot do.
 
I have one of the deepest machines I have ever used.
A BLISSTOOL.
I ordered it from bulgaria and receivd it about three weeks ago.
Is gonna be a killer relic machine.
 
Did I see ergonomics mentioned. If you are not and can not get comfortable swinging a machine you will find less. I have my preference based on which machine I LIKE to swing. Therefore I find more with it. I back it up with another machine that has been modified to be more comfortable to swing. I have had a couple of others and did not like the way they handled or the way they sounded or the way the controls were laid out or the way they handled the soil in eastern Washington state.

I have 3 machines. 1 coil for 1. 2 coils for another. 4 coils for another. Ask me and I will tell you which I use for any situation or which I won't use for that hunt, or why I have 3. I have a primary and 2 secondaries.

I am not the best, but I am willing to share.

Jeff
 
Top