Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

:tesoro:well hit a home run found a" MINT RARE CUTLASS II UMAX " :bouncy:

SEMPERFI61

New member
anyone care to give some feedback on this sweet thing:inlove: is this the same thing as the "side winder umax"?appreciate your input on this ''CUTLASS II UMAX".THANK YOU:blink:THIS IS A 10 KHZ FREQ. ,WILL IT DO BETTER WITH THE 12X10 WAGON WHEEL COIL THAN THE 8:BROWN DONUT ONE?
 
n/t
 
Nice Nab, on the Cutlass II
I'd just stick with the 8" brown. I tried a widescan coil on mine one time and it went bonkers.
Big coil may work fine on yours but if it were me I'd just use the tried and true Donut.
JMHO
 
Similar to the SSumax which I have two. The 8" donut will equal or slightly better the 8X9 spider coil in my tests. The 10X12 will give more coverage and an inch or two more depth at the expense of increased weight while you swing it. It MAY or not need to be balanced to the machine in order to avoid ground chatter. Depends on your soil. You just need to try it and see how it performs. Personally, I've found little use for the larger coils and prefer the standard and smaller for 95% of the detecting I do.
BB
 
The Cutlass II
 
According to the list posted by Robert with Tesoro in the thread "How Old"
CUTLESS II UMAX 2/1998 TO 3/2001
Only Made 3 years.

Might be really rare.
 
Top