Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
T-2 vs At -pro
- Thread starter ccs
- Start date
Either detector will find the keepers very well. The AT Pro has a shorter learning curve.
The AT Pro is a really enjoyable detector to use, the audio is intuitive and nuanced. It suits my brain much better than the F75.
The F75 is definitely deeper. It's more prone to EMI than the AT Pro especially with the big coil. I seem to find good stuff in heavy iron and trash with the F75 and 5" coil every time I use it , but I have to work for it more. It's a higher level of concentration.
I have the F75, but I responded here because since the T2 is very, very similar under the hood.
The AT Pro is a really enjoyable detector to use, the audio is intuitive and nuanced. It suits my brain much better than the F75.
The F75 is definitely deeper. It's more prone to EMI than the AT Pro especially with the big coil. I seem to find good stuff in heavy iron and trash with the F75 and 5" coil every time I use it , but I have to work for it more. It's a higher level of concentration.
I have the F75, but I responded here because since the T2 is very, very similar under the hood.