While there's no arguing the S1 is a great pin pointer, I keep reading posts that imply the S1 can be used in conjunction with a 180 meter. While it works... my S1 has always delivered a reading consistently 4 digits lower than the Sov.
I now have a new Sov GT with the Tornado 1000 coil and a new Digisearch 180 meter. My S1 probe is about 2 years old. (Moved over from my Sov XS)
I can calibrate the meter (via the coil) to 180 using a new dime and the GT will lock dead-on at 180 every time... "BUT... if I switch over to the S1 probe, the meter will read 176! If I calibrate the S1 probe to 180, the S1 will lock dead-on at 180 every time... "BUT... when I switch over to coil, the meter will read 184.:veryangry:
I'm assuming it has something to do with the difference in inductance of the coil windings, resistance, voltages drops etc., between the GT coil and those of the S1 probe. I've always had this 4-digit difference between the S1 and the GT regardless of which one I use to calibrate the meter. The same situation occurred when I used it with my XS and an older rescaled 180 meter
I eventually got use to the 4-digit variance but I can't shake the feeling other SOV users with S1 probes get the same reading. In another post I read you could "internally" calibrate the meter to compensate for coil variance but I don't see how any meter calibration would compensate for the electrical differences between the S1 probe and the GT coil since the meter only has one input shared between the two.
NET: Can anyone suggest a modification I could make "inside" the S1 probe control box? Since the S1 control box allows access to both coil and probe circuits leading to the meter I was thinking I could add in an inductor or variable resister... to the coil or probe circuit that would allow me to change the electrical value of a circuit so the two would "match". Whatever component I add I want to make sure it won't impact the sensitivity.
Hmmm... maybe a good suggestion for Sunray and their next generation of probes. An access hole in the control box that would allow for adjustment of the probes electrical traits so the user could calibrate the probe regardless of what coil you are using.
Any electrical engineers out there with any suggestions? I was also thinking I could shorten the coil wire... but how much? I'd hate to cut it shorter only to have the situation reverse and have the coil read higher than the probe.
Thanks
I now have a new Sov GT with the Tornado 1000 coil and a new Digisearch 180 meter. My S1 probe is about 2 years old. (Moved over from my Sov XS)
I can calibrate the meter (via the coil) to 180 using a new dime and the GT will lock dead-on at 180 every time... "BUT... if I switch over to the S1 probe, the meter will read 176! If I calibrate the S1 probe to 180, the S1 will lock dead-on at 180 every time... "BUT... when I switch over to coil, the meter will read 184.:veryangry:
I'm assuming it has something to do with the difference in inductance of the coil windings, resistance, voltages drops etc., between the GT coil and those of the S1 probe. I've always had this 4-digit difference between the S1 and the GT regardless of which one I use to calibrate the meter. The same situation occurred when I used it with my XS and an older rescaled 180 meter
I eventually got use to the 4-digit variance but I can't shake the feeling other SOV users with S1 probes get the same reading. In another post I read you could "internally" calibrate the meter to compensate for coil variance but I don't see how any meter calibration would compensate for the electrical differences between the S1 probe and the GT coil since the meter only has one input shared between the two.
NET: Can anyone suggest a modification I could make "inside" the S1 probe control box? Since the S1 control box allows access to both coil and probe circuits leading to the meter I was thinking I could add in an inductor or variable resister... to the coil or probe circuit that would allow me to change the electrical value of a circuit so the two would "match". Whatever component I add I want to make sure it won't impact the sensitivity.
Hmmm... maybe a good suggestion for Sunray and their next generation of probes. An access hole in the control box that would allow for adjustment of the probes electrical traits so the user could calibrate the probe regardless of what coil you are using.
Any electrical engineers out there with any suggestions? I was also thinking I could shorten the coil wire... but how much? I'd hate to cut it shorter only to have the situation reverse and have the coil read higher than the probe.
Thanks