Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Sterling chains and earrings

massdigr

New member
I have found a couple of .925 chains with my Q. when the coil swept over them they did not hit in the silver range they showed as nickel 14,15,16. I have also found 925 earrings to do this as well. I was wondering if anyone else has found this to be the case. If so do you know why?

HH Rick,
 
The reason is simple. When detecting chains, the machine only sees one link of the chain or more often, the clasp. The same is true with rings that are broken...they signal very weak, if at all. It's just the dynamics of the way most metal detectors function, as they are geared for coin-sized objects and other "solid" stuff. The exception with chains is when they're "balled up" in a little pile, which is why most of them are found. Stretch a chain out lengthwise and it takes a hell of a detector to get a signal off of it, sometimes even when waved directly over it. I have found several chains that I was about to just pass on due to crappy signal but for some reason pressed on and found a nice chain. So if it sounds even remotely like it might be a good signal, it pays to dig it.
 
Top