Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Statistical Hunting Research

mudpuppy

New member
In 1940, according to the Census, there was a US pop of 132,164,569
Today, theres 317,380,950 as of 5:30 am

In 1940, there were 340 people hit and killed by lightening.
In 2012 there were 28

Some of the old Census data can tell you where the population centers were in the areas where you live...all sorts of other interesting data too...It may help you get an idea where to hunt?
The lightening death stats have continued to fall every year steadily, my main working theory is even though the Pop has tripled, theres fewer people spending any time outdoors...

I'm sure a fellow can deep dive into the data, using even the NOAA weather stats and couple them with archives to try to put you into an area where there was a lot going on in the past on a certain summer...
For Instance:
This past summer here was very cold, hardly anybody outside swimming through July, economy was poor, price of gold over 1200/oz, nobody wearing gold or swimming with it as much as before...beach hunting for drops from this summer was very poor. Now couple that with the lack of kids being outdoors, or the amount of money being carried, and that spells a tough hunt for the drops of 2013....

I might go back and look for a year or two stretch when folks were flush with cash and outdoors a lot, a hot summer when everybody was swimming and camping out a lot...probably in the late 60's early 70's before the oil embargo I'm thinking...then, try to discover the swimming holes/parks of that era by overlaying the map on the heavy Pop centers?

Anyway, its sort of fun to try to track people through Time by using whatever's available that will tell us where they WERE! I think we will be looking for 60's and 70's gold...I suppose a fellow could use some other data to tell us where they WILL be...top of the head would say hunt Asian beaches and resorts if you want to find new wealth gold this year...track the demographics of where the gold wearers like to go, higher end resorts that are booked solid for Spring Break perhaps? And then get there during...Anybody else dink around with data like this? I'm snowed in and going nuts by the way!:stars:
Mud
 
Here's one for you ponder.
The "accepted" ratio of naturally occurring silver to gold in the Earth's crust is about 18 to 1.
I have never sold any of the jewelry I ever found with a detector and last weekend I poured it out and did a quick inventory.
118 silver rings and things------- 7 gold rings------ 16.9 to 1
I have a few things which are combined gold and silver which I don't count since I probably found them because of the silver.
Coincidence?
 
While I agree with the 17 to 1 statistic as a natural occurrence, I don't when it comes to the preferences of humans. Gold was and always has been the preferred metal for jewelry. In years past, when gold was artificially held at $35 per ounce gold was acquired and worn at a much higher rate than silver. My gold jewelry finds are nearly 6 to 1 over silver. I will admit that in the past 20 years or so silver has evened up with gold but I believe that has more to do with the $ of gold more than anything else. Older finds tend toward gold, newer silver. That seems to be my experience.
 
Top