Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

speed of recovery in trash

J

jmaryt

Well-known member
hi!..all!...was wondering if anyone knows if the new mx-6 has the ability to react faster to targets in dense trash as opposed to the xl pro using the SAME SIZE coils?..for example,the 5.3 sized coil?..it
may be too early to ask this question due to the fact the mx-6 was just introduced recently,and hasn't been used extensively yet?..i was just wondering if anyone has hard data to explain which detector would be faster in such an environment?...coil for coil?

regards!
john:shrug:
 
Yes! The Matrix M6 (not MX-6) has a quicker response and recovery. It is a two-filter design, like the MXT, Quantums and Classic series, whereas the XL Pro's circuitry calls for a somewhat faster sweep and also relies on a longer 'ring time' to process the information.

With the 6
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top