Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Sound Differences between all digital machines and analog machines

Canewrap

New member
We had an unusual situation today. My daugter decided to practice her archery in the back yard and after she fired two arrows we noticed that we could not find the arrows. After searching for a while we came to conclusion that the arrows had gone under the turf. Well, recognizing the opportunity to use one of my machines to find them, I got out the Xterra with the 10.5" coil and checked one of the remaining arrow tips to see what I was looking for. Strangely enough, the arrow tip didn't register very loud just under the coil, even at 1". I didn't think this odd at first, hey small tip, unknown metal. Well, after 20 minutes of not finding anything but the signals of bee bees that had been shot earlier, I decided to break out the MXT with the large 12" coil. Well, the MXT sounded off loud and clear on the existing tip and after searching for another 10 minutes I located the arrows. I was able to ignore the bee bee signals and when I got over the tips it sounded off clearly louder than the other targets. I was surprised that the sound quality was so clearly different between the analog type detector (MXT) and the digital (X-terra 70). Has anyone else noticed this sound quality difference between digital and analog type detectors? I intend to run some other tests tomorrow, using the Xterra with its stock coil, just in case this was a coil problem, but it really makes me think I'll need to keep both detectors as I really need a detector with excellent sound discrimination qualities for relic hunting, as well as the fact that the MXT had a depth edge due to its analog threshold.
 
No, but as an ex-fanatical archer in my teens I learned if you loose an arrow go back and shoot another and watch where it goes. Thats easy but it usually works. It one doesn't work, shoot half-a-dozen.:thumbup:
 
Hay Canewrap,

Do you have an Extera 30, 50 or 70?

Do you have the 10.5" DD 7.5 kHz (Mid - Frequency)?

Or do you Have the 10.5" DD 18.75 kHz (High - Frequency)?


Remember the MXT operates at 14 kHz.

Higher frequency two filter machines usually pick up the targets that
are low conductors better. Like your arrows and gold, for example.

I use Tesoro'es, which have a higher operating frequency, and they
do a good job of finding those arrow heads. I've dug several of them.

If you want to find gold jewelry, use the MXT.

If you have the 10.5" DD 7.5 kHz coil, it should work better on coins.

I have never used the Xterra, but that's what I've read about them.

Hope that helps,

Tabdog
 
You know Tabdog, you have a point. I had the 10.5" 7.5 kHz coil on the Xterra yesterday and now I'm wondering if the metal in that arrow would be considered a low conductor and therefore explain why the MXT picked it up better.
 
If it's childrens arrows you are losing, don't worry. The Gov't bailout covers those now y'know, LOL.:heh:
 
Top