Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

soil types and associated issues

upnorth

New member
I don't claim to be the sharpest tack in the box, so I have a question for you folks. Is it my imagination or do detectors quickly lose depth in dense clay soil ?
 
I have not found anything embedded in clay, as it is just too thick up here. I have found on occasion targets below the top sand or gravel matrix, sitting on top of the clay, but not in it. My guess would be that any ferrous oxides would sink and concentrate on the top of the clay layer, giving you issues with depth and possible ID readings not being as accurate.
 
That's my experience, too - the clay tends to stop the goodies. As a former potter, I can confirm that clays often have a lot of ferrous/iron content as well. Not to mention the joy of slip-sliding around on the stuff, and trying to walk with a 4" thick layer on your boots is always entertaining... :rofl:
 
Top