SILVER

[Low-Boy/LCPM]

Found this at about 6 inches but I knew it was silver I could see this shinny silver coin covered with a thin layer of dirt the 3Z is great.

 

[Dave Z]

What'd you sell the 6000 and buy a CZ now?????????????????

 

[Roy(GA)]

How do you do that???

 

[Dave Z]

Just maybe.

 

[Mike (Virginia Beach)]

No, cleary looks like FRAUD to me. He's busted, for sure. Credibility = 0

 

[Low-Boy/LCPM]

I tested the 6000xl and the 3Z on the same target the fisher said high coin and the XL had a meter reading of around 80. I just didn't have the time to state that I am testing detectors they both found the coin so I give credit to fisher and white's

 

[Mike (Virginia Beach)]

Well ok, if you put it that way...

What is a 3Z, anyway? A CZ-3D?

 

[mtdoramike]

thats a cool find! But I'm glad to see the 3d & XL pro are within the same range.

 

[BuckeyeBrad]

is that at that depth, you weren't getting the full benefit of the 3-D in enhanced mode. I like the analog metered Whites too but based on my experience with the two detectors, as you add depth, the Whites will start to drop it's conductivity reading long before the 3-D will when it's in the enhanced mode. I've seen good deep targets that you'll just get a small positive click of an audio and meter reading while the 3-D will give a pretty consistant high coin report.

 

[Dave Z]

and compare signals.Thing I liked about the XLT was that deeper targets would start to read lower before disappearing.The Czs all would just toss the target into iron/coin ,then iron.That's the main reason I stopped using them.Everytime I got a weak iron reading or a coin/iron bounce,I had no way to tell if it was iron or a deep keeper.Dug everything once with the Cz6a.Got about 6 musketballs that were about 7" down.Every one of them read deep iron.