flabuckrud
New member
The shark blew my mind , a .925 stud earing at 18 plus inches in wet saltwater sand. Don't judge the depth by the air test
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
flabuckrud said:The shark blew my mind , a .925 stud earing at 18 plus inches in wet saltwater sand. Don't judge the depth by the air test
hershey1 said:An 18 inch deep target in beach settings is certainly not unheard of.
Tony said:hershey1 said:An 18 inch deep target in beach settings is certainly not unheard of.
Yes.....but an ear ring stud ?????
I have a Minelab GP3500 which tops out on a US nickel at 16" with the Pulsepower Deepstar also the same.
These machines are the most powerful available.
Tony.
Topo said:Tony said:hershey1 said:An 18 inch deep target in beach settings is certainly not unheard of.
Yes.....but an ear ring stud ?????
I have a Minelab GP3500 which tops out on a US nickel at 16" with the Pulsepower Deepstar also the same.
These machines are the most powerful available.
Tony.
I also think 18in. deep is a lot of depth, but saying the minelab is the most powerful available is a bold statement as well
Tony Don't say some thing is FALSE unless you can prove it!! I own a sand shark and have been detecting for 35 years. The sand shark is one of the deepest detectors on the planet. And Minelab isn't one of them.Tony said:flabuckrud said:The shark blew my mind , a .925 stud earing at 18 plus inches in wet saltwater sand. Don't judge the depth by the air test
Okay I'll bite.....Are you trolling? Last post was 15 months ago.
Sorry but 18" for that type of target is simply FALSE.
Hopefully others will agree with me.
I'm tired of ridiculous claims like that.......please post responsibly.
Moderators shouldn't allow such misinformation on their site.
....anyone else wish to support my response ?
Why do I care.......to help newcomers have a realistic idea of what machines are capable of.
T
PS......please explain how you managed to measure the depth at 18" in wet salt sand.....did it start out at 1" ??
junklord3139 said:Tony Don't say some thing is FALSE unless you can prove it!! I own a sand shark and have been detecting for 35 years. The sand shark is one of the deepest detectors on the planet. And Minelab isn't one of them.Tony said:flabuckrud said:The shark blew my mind , a .925 stud earing at 18 plus inches in wet saltwater sand. Don't judge the depth by the air test
Okay I'll bite.....Are you trolling? Last post was 15 months ago.
Sorry but 18" for that type of target is simply FALSE.
Hopefully others will agree with me.
I'm tired of ridiculous claims like that.......please post responsibly.
Moderators shouldn't allow such misinformation on their site.
....anyone else wish to support my response ?
Why do I care.......to help newcomers have a realistic idea of what machines are capable of.
T
PS......please explain how you managed to measure the depth at 18" in wet salt sand.....did it start out at 1" ??
This guy believes it.Woodchuck said:WOW! I never even bothvwith air test,its what it will do in the ground that counts
Tony said:Topo said:Tony said:hershey1 said:An 18 inch deep target in beach settings is certainly not unheard of.
Yes.....but an ear ring stud ?????
I have a Minelab GP3500 which tops out on a US nickel at 16" with the Pulsepower Deepstar also the same.
These machines are the most powerful available.
Tony.
I also think 18in. deep is a lot of depth, but saying the minelab is the most powerful available is a bold statement as well
It is a fact....power/depth is typically measured by current to the coil. The Minelab and other high powered PI's put out nearly an amp to the coil. There are no other consumer machines that achieve this.
Anyhow, I've made my statement and backed it up. Can the OP do the same?