Not entirely true. Have you ever tried an F75? Those are EXTREMELY sensitive to EMI. Many feel that FT didn't do a very good job in terms of suppressing EMI for that detector. I would think these would be just the ticket for that. At the very least it's not very expensive to try and see if it helps.
To try to make sweeping generalizations that this is snake oil when in fact it does work, I really don't "get" that, I'm obviously missing something here, I mean I could sit here and say well the internet doesn't work it's snake oil, but we are ALL using it to read this stuff. In fact the technical stuff I read says it works. Computers use them for many of their cords, as you point out. So are they just idiots who are wasting money, and you know way better than they do how this stuff really works? Or am I just not getting some deep point that you are trying to make here? Because I'm the kind of guy who if you are going to claim something, I'd like to see some proof, and if you are saying this is just snake oil it doesn't work it's a waste of money etc, would you care to give us your evidence to that point other than just an opinion that they are snake oil? Or are we to just take opinion as fact here?
I put one on my Cortes and it did quiet down the Cortes in my house. Fact. I can't exactly demonstrate that over the internet, but that's not opinion, it's fact. If it hadn't worked for me, I'd have said as much.
And finally please don't get the idea I'm trying to be hard on you personally, by pressing this, I'm just as I said a guy that likes to see statements backed up before I take them as gospel. Too many people these days (especially in DC) talk a lot and say nothing of value, so you have to have a discriminating ear so to speak. I'd just like to see proof that this stuff doesn't work and is snake oil, because a lot of companies could save a LOT of money if that's true.