You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Rob (IL) said:RECOVERY DELAY
If you give the V3i 100 R/D time units it must use every one of the time units. If your detector passes over one target, the detector must use 100% of the time units before the V3i can process another target. If you haven't used all 100 units when the coil hits the second target, you probably won't hear the second target.
This isnt entirely accurate.It is possible for another target to be processed before the first target is completely finished being processed.It must be a strong enough signal and I believe this is why many good targets can be found in very close proximity to,if not right next to another target.
Rob (IL) said:As the signal that is being processed decays, if another signal is picked up that is stronger the decaying signal the instrument should sound off on that target so it will be detected. However if the second signal is weaker than the decaying signal then this target will be ignored due to the long recovery delay. ROB
earthmansurfer said:Rob (IL) said:As the signal that is being processed decays, if another signal is picked up that is stronger the decaying signal the instrument should sound off on that target so it will be detected. However if the second signal is weaker than the decaying signal then this target will be ignored due to the long recovery delay. ROB
It seems that on both sides of the pond we have slower recovery (e.g. - Etrac) and faster recovery (e.g. - F75LTD) detectors. Now the V3i can be at either end of the spectrum, as well as anywhere in between. It also seems that one can find small and large coins at both ends of the recovery spectrum. It seems both approaches work but since the V3i is adjustable fully there, I wonder if under certain circumstances one might be better than the other... I think to a degree we are talking personal preference but there must be some science behind it as well.
Question - Is there really a better recovery speed, meaning a faster or in the middle or slower recovery speed, (all other things like Filters, mineralization, etc. considered) for smaller coins in (trash, iron, etc.) or larger coins in (trash, iron, etc.)?