Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Recovery Delay

Rob (IL)

New member
RECOVERY DELAY

Here's some information about recovery delay.

Once the recovery delay cycle is started by the coil encountering a target, the V3i will give a certain recovery time to the RD process. It doesn
 
Great thanks for all of your time and effort.
 
Awesome. This is exaclty what new v3 users need to see. It help make sense of what you read. Thanks. How about some more......;o)
 
I have been running a recovery delay of 30 in a trashy school field. I pulled a 1923 merc from around 6" on edge with a large nail alongside it. For some reason the nail was hitting on the 22.5 and I was able to see 2 targets using the pinpoint bargraph, the dime was hitting on the 2.5. So many of my silver coins have been found with iron in the hole, faster recovery delay along with the 3 frequency pinpointing have made it possible.
 
Thx for the Video Rob. Fox also brought something to my attention. He said that I can use a faster recovery delay (say 80-100) in trashy areas compared to my normal 40 or so. I come from using faster machines and never thought about just going slow for coins (as I couldn't with a set recovery), even if iron or trash is nearby. Have you or any guys used faster recovery delay (meaning a slower recover) in trashy or iron areas. I'm more interested regarding iron as the deep (couple of inches across) iron really killed me today with falsing. I have to do some adjustments. I was getting falses and the faster recovery seemed to negate that (in hindsight I should have tried upping my filter from 5 to 10)
 
Many things seem backward here. A recovery delay of 40 is pretty fast and you might want to go to 25 or 30 for super fast. RD of 80 to100 is pretty slow and that is what I use for hunting deep targets in clean ground. For hunting slower in trash you would want to keep your filters at 5, I would think, and if trash is that bad I might suggest a smaller coil if you are using the stock coil.

To help cure falsing you will want to reduce the Gain and AC Discrimination until stable.
 
The video is not mine, it is from You Tube.

I might be reading something wrong but you want a short delay (40 - 50) not a long delay (80 to 100) in trash. The number is for the delay, not the recovery. You want a small number of time units before the detector recovers when targets are close. ROB

I just read that post. He dropped it from 105 to 80 and (important) slowed his normal swing down. For a given coil if you slow your speed you need a longer delay. It's how much time the coil is over the target. For the same speed a 10" coil might use a RD of 95, but a 6x10 would need a RD of 55. There where also other changes that have to be considered.
 
Sorry for the mix up, I'm still not used to saying "recovery delay" instead of recovery speed. The scary thing is, I knew what I was talking about.

Larry - I use a recovery delay of 20 in my Deus program and it works very well. The deep iron doesn't bother it. I think the reason I had tons of falsing on the deep iron today was because I moved my filters to 5 high from 10 as it's the only thing I changed since last time. The area I hunt has almost zero trash, but it has lots of iron. I mean lots of deep iron. I never noticed it with my Omega as it was just out of it's range, but when I have the V3i at disc or 85 to 95 it generally comes in and today it was giving me good signals at times, but falsing constantly. This didn't happen with the recovery delay at 20 and slightly lower sens.

Rob - I'll have to try playing with the 100 range of recovery delay in iron to see if that works, with a slow swing speed of course.
Today was my first challenge, just have to try some new settings. The odd thing is, it's easier to know what to try at home than in the field. :veryangry:
 
One thing I noticed with my V3i, the quicker the recovery delay (below 30) the more broken my target tone would be, slowed the recovery delay down to 50 and now get a smooth target tone. The broken tone was driving me crazy.

Joe
 
I've talked to rcsnake about this. That's why I recommended in past posts that if you reduced the delay too much you can lose some of the signal. Bob recommended no lower than 40. Can you go lower,YES. Use what works for you. ROB
 
Rob (IL) said:
RECOVERY DELAY

If you give the V3i 100 R/D time units it must use every one of the time units. If your detector passes over one target, the detector must use 100% of the time units before the V3i can process another target. If you haven't used all 100 units when the coil hits the second target, you probably won't hear the second target.


This isnt entirely accurate.It is possible for another target to be processed before the first target is completely finished being processed.It must be a strong enough signal and I believe this is why many good targets can be found in very close proximity to,if not right next to another target.
 
As the signal that is being processed decays, if another signal is picked up that is stronger the decaying signal the instrument should sound off on that target so it will be detected. However if the second signal is weaker than the decaying signal then this target will be ignored due to the long recovery delay. ROB
 
Rob (IL) said:
As the signal that is being processed decays, if another signal is picked up that is stronger the decaying signal the instrument should sound off on that target so it will be detected. However if the second signal is weaker than the decaying signal then this target will be ignored due to the long recovery delay. ROB

It seems that on both sides of the pond we have slower recovery (e.g. - Etrac) and faster recovery (e.g. - F75LTD) detectors. Now the V3i can be at either end of the spectrum, as well as anywhere in between. It also seems that one can find small and large coins at both ends of the recovery spectrum. It seems both approaches work but since the V3i is adjustable fully there, I wonder if under certain circumstances one might be better than the other... I think to a degree we are talking personal preference but there must be some science behind it as well.

Question - Is there really a better recovery speed, meaning a faster or in the middle or slower recovery speed, (all other things like Filters, mineralization, etc. considered) for smaller coins in (trash, iron, etc.) or larger coins in (trash, iron, etc.)?
 
My mistake, I meant to say Discrimination sensitivity.
 
earthmansurfer said:
Rob (IL) said:
As the signal that is being processed decays, if another signal is picked up that is stronger the decaying signal the instrument should sound off on that target so it will be detected. However if the second signal is weaker than the decaying signal then this target will be ignored due to the long recovery delay. ROB

It seems that on both sides of the pond we have slower recovery (e.g. - Etrac) and faster recovery (e.g. - F75LTD) detectors. Now the V3i can be at either end of the spectrum, as well as anywhere in between. It also seems that one can find small and large coins at both ends of the recovery spectrum. It seems both approaches work but since the V3i is adjustable fully there, I wonder if under certain circumstances one might be better than the other... I think to a degree we are talking personal preference but there must be some science behind it as well.

Question - Is there really a better recovery speed, meaning a faster or in the middle or slower recovery speed, (all other things like Filters, mineralization, etc. considered) for smaller coins in (trash, iron, etc.) or larger coins in (trash, iron, etc.)?

I got out yesterday and did some cross checking. Out of 8 or so buttons I found, only two weren't picked up with slower recovery speeds (60). The Deus program I ran (had recovery delay at 20) and hit the smaller degraded button fine. Of the 3 small coins I found (1 hammered) the slower and faster recovery speeds worked (and it was in iron). The other settings didn't seem to matter as much regarding to the size of the target (really talking sensitivity).
 
Top