When we were testing the prototype, Jeff Foster found that there was an offset when trying to balance for salt water. The tracking was changed in an attempt to get rid of that offset. Such is life. I think having it with the original was better, and salt water offset could be corrected with the "manual" tracking offset.
Now here is the problem, as I said Bob used 50 in the Hi Pro program, and yet Da Fox uses 5 in his Florida soil. The soil determines the best speed. Leave "report" on and watch the arrows. Find a speed were you don't have overshoot or undershoot, the detector is quiet, and the arrows aren't constantly changing.
Here's an old post by the software engineer.
Tracking Speed, lower numbers equals slower track speed. The V is always tracking as long as auto track is on. The control adjusts the limit of how much it can track at one time. So, (example - numbers are not correct at all - just to give you an idea what's going on), say you have a ground signal that is off by 10000 from where ground really is. If you have your setting at 10, the detector would track at the most by 20 at one sample. If your ground was off by only 8, then it would adjust by 8 as that's less than the limit. But at 10000, it will be limited to 10 at that one data sample. Whereas, a setting of 20 will track at most by 40 per data sample. There are a lot of factors that come into play on how tracking is adjusted - whether it has seen a target recently, how fast the ground is changing, the user adjustable track speed, how close the ground setting is to the current ground. If the ground setting is close to the current ground, it will track to the current ground faster than if the current reading is far away (might be a target and don't want to track to targets).