having detected for over 35 years, maybe I am. And just don't want to admit it!
I agree with rwsnc about Xing over a target. It almost seems as if you can tell how long someone has been detecting by whether or not they use the pinpoint function. Not all the time. But it appears many of the "seasoned veterans" still prefer to simply X over it, and dig. (or in the case of a DD coil, wiggle, drag and dig) Again, that is not to say some don't enjoy the pinpoint function. But when you cut your teeth on a detector without pinpointing or discrimination, it makes for some lifelong habits that are hard to break. In this matter, I say if it ain't broke, don't fix it. It's all a matter of personal preference.
As to whether it costs more to make detectors with the pinpointing functionality, probably not any more. I imagine lots of dollars went into the design and development of the first pinpointing motion based detectors. But with today's electonics, it is more a matter of software programming than it is hardware. Not to oversimplify the process. But you take a motion based VLF detector with an LCD, program it to have an all metal / non-motion mode, add a variable controlled oscillator for audio variance, and you basically have today's pinpointing capabilities. Add software for measuring signal strength, and you have depth indication.
Personally, I still like to X over the target with most detectors. However, the Prospecting mode of my X-70 gets a lot of use for sizing and pinpointing. JMHO HH Randy
P.S. I believe AHPro may have had the first detector with the Pinpoint function. But being an old timer, I can't swear to it.
One of my first detectors was a Jetco Mustang. If I recall, I paid around $20 for it. If you asked my brother, he'd tell you it was the only detector he ever saw that would hunt around corners.