Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Question about TTF

Something about this may have been posted before, but I couldn't find it....

Would it make sense to use TTF with the bottom of the screen open (accepting all ferrous) and the top a normal discrimination pattern?

I've used it with the screen completely open and have had some amazing results, but I'm wondering if it would be possible to decrease the amount of signals without diminishing the benefits of TTF.

Thanks,

Phillip
 
I guess it depends on your location and what is in the ground. This might be ok in a site where you have heavy iron and very llittle conductive targets, but in a park where you have a million pulltabs, disc'ing those out would be as bad as discin'g out nails in a field. The point is being able to hear the good target beside the bad....IMHO
 
Well, I have to give your opinion lots of weight, since you're the one that turned me on to TTF in the first place! I tried the discrimination on top with the open bottom today at a soon to be ghost town and, quite frankly, didn't like it. What I like most about TTF is the lack of nulling. Running the discrimination pattern on top brought back the nulling. Oh, well, lesson learned!

Thanks for your input.
 
Top