The closed thread on ML's USA service should be re-opened. If there has been a deterioration in MineLab's Nevada repair site then this should be known to the ML community. One response to my earlier reply inferred that I and others were denigrating MineLab's quality of their products - this is not true. I re-read the thread and not one person said that MineLab made inferior products, in general or in relationship to some other brand. The main complaint was that the Nevada facility was undermanned for the repair workload and was taking too long to return customer's detectors and even some of them were not repaired properly.
Now, all the major detector brands have good reputations for quality of product. The recent exceptions have been the Chinese knock-offs that are coming on the market these past few years. But serious detectionists know to avoid them as they do suffer from poor quality of product and lack any service whatsoever.
No manufacturer makes a perfect product. There will always be a need for a service department. When I consider metal detector I consider the following:
1) Technology used: is it up to date and if possible have a leading edge?
2) What is its Quality of Product reputation in the user community? Forums such as this are extremely valuable in this regard.
3) How well is it supported after purchase? Warranty and Quality of Service?
ML rates 10/10 for the first two considerations. Now there is some doubts about number 3. The closed thread was an honest and forthright discussion of possible problems with ML's repair services.
As I stated earlier, nothing lasts forever. That includes companies that become the premier manufacturer in their arena such as GM was for cars and MineLab is for metal detectors. Even Mercedes and Toyota will one day become has-beens. I constantly look for signs of those that are first becoming those that will be last.
Last March MineLab was acquired by Codan Ltd: Codan Limited is the communications business unit and the parent company of the Codan Group, which is engaged in business through its three operating segments
Now, all the major detector brands have good reputations for quality of product. The recent exceptions have been the Chinese knock-offs that are coming on the market these past few years. But serious detectionists know to avoid them as they do suffer from poor quality of product and lack any service whatsoever.
No manufacturer makes a perfect product. There will always be a need for a service department. When I consider metal detector I consider the following:
1) Technology used: is it up to date and if possible have a leading edge?
2) What is its Quality of Product reputation in the user community? Forums such as this are extremely valuable in this regard.
3) How well is it supported after purchase? Warranty and Quality of Service?
ML rates 10/10 for the first two considerations. Now there is some doubts about number 3. The closed thread was an honest and forthright discussion of possible problems with ML's repair services.
As I stated earlier, nothing lasts forever. That includes companies that become the premier manufacturer in their arena such as GM was for cars and MineLab is for metal detectors. Even Mercedes and Toyota will one day become has-beens. I constantly look for signs of those that are first becoming those that will be last.
Last March MineLab was acquired by Codan Ltd: Codan Limited is the communications business unit and the parent company of the Codan Group, which is engaged in business through its three operating segments