Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Prism series and coil selections

D

dirtfisher

New member
:) Does anyone agree that the Prism series should have been designed with a different operating frequency so that the normal coils like Bullseye 5.3, 800, 950 etc could be used? I dont much care for the name either. Also they are priced a little high as compared to the competition. I think they should go back to the drawing board on this one. :nerd: I have heard they are good detectors but I think the popular IDX Pro should have been reintroduced with depth and tone ID and backlight instead of being discontinued. Just my 2 cents. Good Hunting.
 
I have to agree with your view on keeping the IDX Pro with the additional features. I must say I haven't used or even looked at the Prism yet. The thing that bothers me is the use of the touch pads. I haven't had anything that uses a touch pad to last. IE cell phones, video games, etc. They just wear out way too fast. The mechanical switches last. The mechanical switches on my Coinmaster IV from the early 70's still function today. I expect the same results from my IDX Pro.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top