Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
plowed field mode????????
- Thread starter Sonny(IN)
- Start date
jeff@middlesex
New member
Don't know yet but a lot of us do hunt plowed fields so we will be watching this closely
Aesop
Member
Dave Johnson explains it like this----Process # refers to the way the ID system samples the signal. In the T2 that was interleaved with the selection of tones: in the F75 tones are tones-- process selection is separate. There are three processes: default, bottlecap and PF mode (for "plowed field")
Sounds cool!!
Need some time to get stuff together for later tonight.
Mike
This post was made by Mike Scott on the other Official Fisher Forum at TD.
Sounds cool!!
Need some time to get stuff together for later tonight.
Mike
This post was made by Mike Scott on the other Official Fisher Forum at TD.
Hello Jeff. May I make an educated guess?
Logically thinking, one can anticipate a rapidly changing distance variation of search-head to undulating ground scenario.
This will in turn presents an excessive signal-base line variation due to the plough furrows, when compared to the relatively slower less demanding 'flat' ground.
This would require a more refined filtering of signal or sampling timing, to achieve an acceptable accuracy of target identification.
Hope this explanation offers some insight into the subject...MattR.UK.
Logically thinking, one can anticipate a rapidly changing distance variation of search-head to undulating ground scenario.
This will in turn presents an excessive signal-base line variation due to the plough furrows, when compared to the relatively slower less demanding 'flat' ground.
This would require a more refined filtering of signal or sampling timing, to achieve an acceptable accuracy of target identification.
Hope this explanation offers some insight into the subject...MattR.UK.
Jackpine Savage
Active member
That begs the question. Even tho the GB is "fixed" using manual GB or Fast Grab is there some other type of ground monitoring/correction going on? I wondered about that after reading the T2's operating manual when it described Mode 1 as being for "lumpy ground".
Lumpy ground/plowed ground... should have just called it uneven ground and kept it simple.
Lumpy ground/plowed ground... should have just called it uneven ground and kept it simple.
There are alot of good reports on this mode, & I'm excited about it. I have yet to get it to a field, but there are lots of detectors that suffer greatly in that fluffy fresh plow soil because many modern/newer detectors like a more solid ground matrix. If this "process" feature helps that aspect, PLUS is useful in high grass & woods it sounds very cool to me. Not just one of those "extra" bells & whistles you'll never use 
Bill
Bill