Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

omega 11'' iron test

nice shoes...it still will be different in the ground. And are you seeing a different VDI or hearing another tone with the iron?
 
on a small nail id is correct on the larger higher seeding changes
T2 nail has no chance, sleeps a handful of coins you put a nail, and the detector did not see anything
 
When I have done a nail test with my T2, once the nail (rusty) is within 1 or 2 inches or so I have trouble getting it to respond. No chance with it on it like in your video. My T2 does good in iron, I thought but it does look like the Omega might be doing better.

I am really starting to get frustrated with all of this Omega 8000 talk. I don't mean that in a bad way. I mean, shouldn't the T2 be CLEARLY better than a detector hundreds of dollars less and made by the same company? Now, maybe in some ways it is better, but I don't clearly see how. Maybe 1" deeper I hear?

That said, I hope they don't downgrade the Omega 8000 like they did with the T2 ltd compared to the F75 ltd.
 
easy when it's perpendicular hard when it's parallel

Keith
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top