I've been reading about the basic use of the Explorer II, until my eyes are bleeding. My problem is that the more I read, the more I see the same talk about distinguishing tones based on their "round sound" or their "Flat sound", or even their "Squished" quality.
Although my hearing acuity is fine, my ability to distinguish between sounds based on how round, or flat, or squished they are is non-existent. I need some tuteledge based strictly on VISUAL cues, but even the visual cursor placement seems to have very variable rules.
My "previously loved" Explorer II arrives Thursday, and I'm really stoked to try it out, but HONESTLY, will it "tell" me more than my C$?
Thanks in advance,
Tagamet
Although my hearing acuity is fine, my ability to distinguish between sounds based on how round, or flat, or squished they are is non-existent. I need some tuteledge based strictly on VISUAL cues, but even the visual cursor placement seems to have very variable rules.
My "previously loved" Explorer II arrives Thursday, and I'm really stoked to try it out, but HONESTLY, will it "tell" me more than my C$?
Thanks in advance,
Tagamet

The accuracy of the tone id coupled with the smart screen cross hairs tels me what i am about to dig before i dig (mostly). Believe me once mastered the target id on the explorer 2 is Far in advance of any detector made today or in the near future likely EVER to be made. TEN OUT OF TEN FOR ITS RED HOT RESPONSE TO SILVER TOO!............... The explorer 2 is the worlds best by far.