You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Bill_S said:I have one. Not so sure about it though. On my etrac the TID numbers on the snake are not the same as the stock coil. The NEL hits zinc's at 38-39, dimes at 45-46 and quarters at 48. Seems like the numbers are off by a few. Will have to test it at one of the local parks.
D&P-OR said:Bill------I'll bet it's like the EQ2 (7 X 4.5") in that regard.----It pushed the #'s higher on the Explorer/Etrac.----The only coil I ever had for these detectors that did that.-----I was wondering if this coil would do the same thing.-----Let us know how your tests come out.----------DelBill_S said:I have one. Not so sure about it though. On my etrac the TID numbers on the snake are not the same as the stock coil. The NEL hits zinc's at 38-39, dimes at 45-46 and quarters at 48. Seems like the numbers are off by a few. Will have to test it at one of the local parks.
Bill_S said:I have one. Not so sure about it though. On my etrac the TID numbers on the snake are not the same as the stock coil. The NEL hits zinc's at 38-39, dimes at 45-46 and quarters at 48. Seems like the numbers are off by a few. Will have to test it at one of the local parks.
ironsight said:Bill_S said:I have one. Not so sure about it though. On my etrac the TID numbers on the snake are not the same as the stock coil. The NEL hits zinc's at 38-39, dimes at 45-46 and quarters at 48. Seems like the numbers are off by a few. Will have to test it at one of the local parks.
Who cares if they're not 'exactly' the same. Its an aftermarket coil that you would pitch just because its off a little?
Based on the ID numbers posted they are basically more or less the same as my stock coil's IDs.
Those ID numbers posted are definite digs in my book. Far as i'm concerned they're all in the ballpark.
Most oldies i dug up around here are deep or around junk with usually iffy IDs all over the map. So much for ID accuracy!
I noticed the same thing.
Read a thread at this site somewhere about it and found if you detect in the lower number noise channels, below 4 , the VID numbers return to "normal".
I noticed the same thing.
Read a thread at this site somewhere about it and found if you detect in the lower number noise channels, below 4 , the VID numbers return to "normal".
Bill_S said:I noticed the same thing.
Read a thread at this site somewhere about it and found if you detect in the lower number noise channels, below 4 , the VID numbers return to "normal".
You are exactly right. I put my noise cancel on 11 and the numbers were all over the place. On 1 they were right on. Weird.
Bill_S said:The cord is not wound very tight had to take a piece of string and pull it through the rod