Hey Gang,
I just wanted to drop in and join in,,Lol! I have been away from beepin' for a while, but just bought a new F5 to get back into it. Life seems to have finally made some room for it again. (Kids all in college..and out 'da house!) I thought I might throw out my 2 cents for picking the F5 over some others.
1) Reading a bunch of stuff, I realized there is no "perfect" MD. Most of the serious diggers have multiple MD's for different sites.
2) Technology has changed a bit and my understanding of it as it applies to metal detecting is lacking.
3) The F5 has separate controls for almost everything, and a VID - so I figure I can treat it as a science project - change things, see what happens, repeat. Until I understand how each setting affects performance. Then I figure if I want to move up to a "high performance" detector I will know better what I want for the type of TH'ing I do. I am not concerned with overall performance of the machine just yet either. I have seen multiple posts of it finding A to Zincoln. I know it will find plenty for me as I learn to drive it.
4) Mike Hillis is pretty convincing !!
5) I wanted a machine I could try over a wide range of terrain. I think the F5 will get me there.
I know it's not a machine for every newby. I just think I am willing to learn it. The only negatives I have read really are the faceplate scratching easily, battery tabs, and a lack of depth. I question the lack of depth a bit as user error can make a big difference. The face plate on mine will most likely get covered.
Any thoughts on the faceplate cover, or things I should add, let me know....
HH
I just wanted to drop in and join in,,Lol! I have been away from beepin' for a while, but just bought a new F5 to get back into it. Life seems to have finally made some room for it again. (Kids all in college..and out 'da house!) I thought I might throw out my 2 cents for picking the F5 over some others.
1) Reading a bunch of stuff, I realized there is no "perfect" MD. Most of the serious diggers have multiple MD's for different sites.
2) Technology has changed a bit and my understanding of it as it applies to metal detecting is lacking.
3) The F5 has separate controls for almost everything, and a VID - so I figure I can treat it as a science project - change things, see what happens, repeat. Until I understand how each setting affects performance. Then I figure if I want to move up to a "high performance" detector I will know better what I want for the type of TH'ing I do. I am not concerned with overall performance of the machine just yet either. I have seen multiple posts of it finding A to Zincoln. I know it will find plenty for me as I learn to drive it.
4) Mike Hillis is pretty convincing !!
5) I wanted a machine I could try over a wide range of terrain. I think the F5 will get me there.
I know it's not a machine for every newby. I just think I am willing to learn it. The only negatives I have read really are the faceplate scratching easily, battery tabs, and a lack of depth. I question the lack of depth a bit as user error can make a big difference. The face plate on mine will most likely get covered.
Any thoughts on the faceplate cover, or things I should add, let me know....
HH