I'm trying to nail down this bad machine / good machine thing. I'm thinking it is a mineralization problem and maybe not a bad machine problem (although some units seem defective due to low air tests scores). If anyone could try this scenario and post their finds, I think it would give us lots to think about. There is no easy way to test the mineral content from everyone's area, but I think this is a great and easy way to compare them. If anyone, who is willing, would go to the sites that they were testing earlier, and put it in stock coin mode, and make sure it's in auto sensitivity and don't boost the sens (no +1, +2 or +3). Then tell us the sensitivity reading that the machine uses. This is an easy way to tell how much minerals the machine is sensing. If the people that are finding deep coins, have high sensitivity readings, (24, 25, 26, ...etc) then I'll assume that their soil is mild and that some of the depth is due to that. If the people that report coins shallow (like me) and their auto sensitivity is around 15 ish, then I'll assume their soil is mineralised (hot). Would appreciate people from all over the world (especially UK) to help too. Please remember stock coin, auto sens only, to keep it uniform. I will post mine when I can get to my site. Thanks all. It may be that these machines have an oversensitivity to minerals and may be some kind of filter problem. Hoping this works like I think it will!!