Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Nail test revisited

bigelow

Member
[video]https://youtu.be/iIq60BFGDJE[/video]
 
It may be a good test, but I can't hear you on the video. My sound level is all the way up and the sound is barely coming through.
 
Can't hear it either.
unearth said:
It may be a good test, but I can't hear you on the video. My sound level is all the way up and the sound is barely coming through.
 
hmm odd i can hear it on my computer
 
it appears it got turned down during editing oops sorry but if possible to listen in quiet environment it may be heard
 
re uploading with better sound
 
Video is down?:shrug:
 
here is the updated version since for whatever reason we cant edit posts here
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HhiISl5WYY[/video]
 
bigelow said:
here is the updated version since for whatever reason we cant edit posts here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HhiISl5WYY
I know you got burned by park1 in your first video but it might still be one of the best options. My theory strictly based on specs and theory. Basing this on how each mode is weighted to certain frequencies for specific targets. Park 1 and field 1 are weighted to hit better on high conductors (silver coins). I would get a good ground balance in park 1 or field 1. I would then turn the iron bias to zero( field 1 is already at zero) and try the test again. I would use 50 tone and turn the iron volume down. While sweeping the target I would adjust the reactivity (speed) up and down to get the best result. If I were trying to figure out a good iron program this is where I would start. I am not asking you to make a video but if you do try these settings let me know if it works. I am strictly basing this on my understanding of how this detector works. I have nothing better to do as I not so patiently wait on mine.
 
Thanks for the tips hopefully tomorrow I can do some more testing
Mountain Mike said:
here is the updated version since for whatever reason we cant edit posts here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HhiISl5WYY
I know you got burned by park1 in your first video but it might still be one of the best options. My theory strictly based on specs and theory. Basing this on how each mode is weighted to certain frequencies for specific targets. Park 1 and field 1 are weighted to hit better on high conductors (silver coins). I would get a good ground balance in park 1 or field 1. I would then turn the iron bias to zero( field 1 is already at zero) and try the test again. I would use 50 tone and turn the iron volume down. While sweeping the target I would adjust the reactivity (speed) up and down to get the best result. If I were trying to figure out a good iron program this is where I would start. I am not asking you to make a video but if you do try these settings let me know if it works. I am strictly basing this on my understanding of how this detector works. I have nothing better to do as I not so patiently wait on mine.
 
Top