No bones or evidence remaining from a creature that would have to have been here for thousands of years? The reason could not be small numbers as any biologist will tell you that a group that small, particularly humanoids with their young not maturing quickly, simply would not be able to survive for the length of time required to still be with us
.
Myself and many friends, all observant and experienced outdoorsmen traveled many thousands of miles by horse, snowmobile, and Quad in the very areas where people claim to see them often, we never found a track
Seems odd also that the many people who pursue them
do not do so in winter when their odds would be best of tracking. Nobody has ever had any luck using dogs either. Natives in a northern area claimed to have seen one last year and provided hair from the alleged "Bigfoot", it turned out to be from a Muskox or Bison, can't remember at the moment.
Some have made the lame excuse that they are very intelligent and can hide, but where do they get food for many months of winter? . If they hibernated they would be found also, just like Bears.
Most humans are suckers for a good hoax and want to believe, just ask PT Barnum or any politician
Yes i am a total sceptic cause of my own experiences and knowing that hundreds of thousands, if not millions of folk spent their entire lives in the wilderness and never saw one. A bit too convenient also that they are only said to live in heavily treed or mountainous areas. In this age of every second person of the millions who visit wilderness having a camera, often with very good telescopic lenses, one would guess the odds of ol' "Bigfoot" avoiding being a Youtube star are small methinks
: