Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

My observations of the Racer and how I see it as a tool for me...

Ytcoinshooter

Well-known member
A little background why bought the Racer. I decided to sell my IDX Pro since I only used it for an annual competition hunt or as a loaner. That left a void to fill, replace detector #8....yes my wife knows I can never have enough detectors or gear. I decided that I could find something light weight to replace it that I could use for other applications too. I looked at several options from Teknetics and Fisher mainly. I've eyed some of their offerings in the past but none were really offering anything over my present selection of turf units. The XP Deus definitely offered up what I was considering and a couple of times in the last year I came close to pulling the trigger on that purchase. In watching a few YouTube videos on the Racer and learning about the Nokta Fors CoRe I was
I was impressed with the sensitivity under a variety of conditions. The recovery speed and ability to handle bad ground just stuck with me. I have a step daughter that lives not far from Culpepper Va. and my experience hunting in the red soil and red clay there in 2009 with my old DFX was a lesson. Nasty soil to try and find anything small that is even a little deep...NUTZ!
Mentioning some of the notable the areas I took my new Racer to included a hard hunted park built on old farmland (I used to find plenty of silver an occasional draped bust LC) that saw much activity from the 1940's - 1970's it's still used today as open space but retains many features from its heyday. On another day I tried the racer at a drained lake bottom that used to be an old swimming area and I have been over this with several detectors up for a little over year now and is very little left. In the northwest area of CT I hit a very low reservoir that had seen swimming activity in a couple of semi secluded spots over 40 years ago but not permitted since. After the reservoir I headed to a park that had been a Berkshire Hills summer camp from the 1920's into the 1970's and contains difficult ground that rarely gives up anything these days. I did manage to locate a small green lead howitzer, shown where with the junk and coins from the lowered reservoir
I detected a popular saltwater beach with extreme sand mineralization. I was able to ground balance on the beach at 02 where the water was receding with each wave. Moving a few feet to where tha sand was still wet from the tide but the water was not lapping the GB was 30 - 32. Moving to the dry sand my GB was 40. Further up from the water before the dunes the sand is extreme red and some areas were clearly black magnetic mixed with red, GB varied from 72 to 84 depending on the mix and concentration of those sands. I have to go on to say the saltwater beach testing impressed me to where the Racer had the best performance of any single frequency detector in that environment, it knocked my socks off. It is capable of competing with the dual, multi frequency & BBS units I have tried there and own. I kept repeating to myself "this is sick", I wish I was not alone when testing it there because I was so impressed I felt I needed a witness. I had seen the YouTube videos of the racer on a salt beach and shook my head in disbelief until I got hands on. I rarely these days even arrive at the beach with a detector unless it's a waterproof unit because I've mainly been a surf hunter except in the colder months when I will hunt out of the water from the lapping shore to the dunes. The Racer is perfect for this type of hunting where the digging is easy and anything above iron is potentially a keeper.
The sensitivity (and separation!) plus the stability of the Racer in every place I took it was outstanding except my front yard (EMI / RFI) where no amount of frequency shifting and reduced gain could get quiet enough to my liking. My back yard was a little better. The 60 cycle overhead power lines are tough. I don't expect this to be a major problem but if my front yard was a hunt site I have other units that fare a bit better. I decided to just chalk it up to extreme sensitivity the Racer possesses. I also noticed quite a bit of two way cross talk (back and forth) with other detectors at last weeks club hunt in a farm field. One of my go to detectors causes others fits but remain stable for me when getting close to other units, the Racer was receiving interference as well as dishing it out.
Continuing with the sensitivity, this detector at the beach (especially) will be a killer on micro jewelry. Namely stud earrings, earring backings and very thin gold. At the drained lake area I was chasing extreme tiny bits of nothing a couple inches deep in the sand that the Racer was loud and clear on and my pin pointers were having trouble finding out of the hole. Both my TRX and Pro Pointer had me searching the piles for what seemed stupid long only to locate a foil flake or a bit of junk that seemed invisible to me.

I did find that for me the Racer is not suited for traditional cherry picking. I will preface the following comments with this. I fully understand and expect sensitive detectors to occasionally read a deep iron nail (for example) or the target ID sometimes will "wrap" around the ID scale. Nonferrous targets mostly do not exhibit this reaction on the detectors I know well. There are two reasons why casual cherry picking ain't the Racers forte. 1) there is a big variance in the target ID of some very common trash items in the ground I often encountered targets that's read well into the 80's and even beyond that when dug out reverted to their expected ID range. I lost count of the foil I dug that read into the mid 80's with a reasonably smooth sound, especially if it was wadded up. Out of the ground these offenders would ring up in the 50's mostly, small near surface pieces of foil that were irregular were more identifiable and showed 40's+. I kept listening for any raggedness as the audio rise - peak - fall, expecting the raggedness on the front and back ends. It was not always coming through to let me know it's junk. I encountered ring pulls that would spike into the 80's only to show low 60's out of the ground. Crown caps depending upon their composition varied from easily identifiable by audio & visual to those that rang up into the higher VDI's with smoother - though not silky audio.
The most exciting VDI is nothing - blank with a high tone and a depth reading of greater than 4". Pot luck and the occasional copper or silver coin would turn up.
This is a "diggers" machine that won't miss targets unless it's just too deep or you tire of digging. My 10" planted quarter is out of its range in my soil. I also have enough EMI to where I couldn't turn up the gain in all metal beyond 80 to get a good test because of this interference. In the 2 & 3 tone I was able to test the gain up to max (though a bit unstable) and the Racer didn't make a peep. Something tells from messing around me I might get a one way response in AM at the highest gain setting.

Battery life - after about 20 hours on 4 fresh alkaline the indicator just dropped by one segment. I don't get why they put the rechargeable kit in the pro pack with this kind of battery life. In fact while mentioning the pro pack it could have been made better by deleting a couple of the fluff items and substituting with an extra lower rod and hardware for the 4.5" x 5" oor. Those headphones in the pack? Let's be real, they are not suited for detecting by their construction and a silly 1 meter straight cord. I haven't evened opened them. The 32 ohm rating is ok but beyond that they are best for your mobile audio or computing device. I like the environmental covers yet the one that fits under the armrest does not protect the rotary knob in the event of rain. I did find a fix for this by easily placing a factory Whites cover from my old XLT / DFX detectors over the neoprene Makro cover.
I am learning the nuances of the audio & visual responses. I walk a circle around the target trying to see if the audio / visual response degrades. This detector is made for difficult sites where there is a trash concentration and / or difficult soil exist. I may have made a lot about the lack of target resolution, especially for the lower conductors but Monday some things began to click. It doesn't change my opinion of the visual target ID system and how it "upward averages" deeper targets. The two silver coins I dug Monday silver coins were standout signals visually & audibly. The 1944 quarter rang up at 90 and was no more than 4". Seeing the edge in the clump never gets old

The 1941 dime rang up in the 85 - 87 range and was around 4" down . For me what was remarkable is that I've walked over both these silvers countless times on the exact same path with many detectors since the 1980's. Having pulled 100+ silvers from the site it has been a place to run every different detector I acquired. The area is trashy with more being deposited every year. It was the Racers fast recovery in the junky stuff that helped.
Those long pieces of rusty wire rang up real nice on the Racer, thought I had a good silver coin. It was found as one piece but it busted trying to get the pia trash out.
I ended up with 3 hard won silvers from a truly difficult place that I fortunately could dig freely to get to know what the Racer was trying to tell me. The small green cannon came from a little strip of turf in the former summer camp that would have been located just outside the door to the post office / camp store. The original buildings are long gone, but I had detected years ago when they all were there, took photos and drew a map of the original layout. I and others have beat it to death. The prime area outside that former building is about 15' x 60' that held barbers, newer silvers and coughed up one "CC" seated dime all 20+ years ago.
See those tire valves in the pic below? Rang up like a dime....
Sorry if I'm long winded, rambling, I really spent the time using all I've learned detecting to give this detector an honest shake. After yesterday I'm at about 25 hours on it. Beach, relic and pounded sites is where this detector fits in for me. Having the Racer, for me, the way I intend on using it is a bit of a luxury, definitely not as an "only" - or primary detector but as a tool that will help me milk worn out hunt sites, dive into trashy sites, work the beach in a light form factor and cut into tough soil conditions without too much fussing with settings. It performs well!
HH - Bruce
 
Very good overall story/review. And mirrors much of what I've seen with the detector. Definitely a sneaky little detector. And it can make one scratch their head, especially when the surprisingly shallow coins have been there all the time----with other metal detector's coils passing over and the coin's life underground continued to live on
 
The Roosevelt dime in the last pic was the deepest at 6". Nothing on the VDI and sweet sounding. The other silvers were what I'd consider shallow being no more than 4". It's a fun detector that rewards persistent digging.
 
And that's what I have been trying to get across... But you said it better than I ever could. There are those who will scratch their head till the scalp falls off and not fully understand what this thing can do, or how it does it
 
Thx for the write up ytc. It does have a place in ones arsenal for sure. My last trip to WV, as many others have found; I pulled in coins from a family yard that I have hunted for some time. Knew the racer could pull in more if it was there and I found out there was more than I thought. Best being a 1888 IH.
 
Bruce, Excellent write up. I'm glad someone has finally written just what I think about the Racer. I'm just to crappy of a writer to do it myself. When I started using the Racer, I found it to be the most exciting new detector I'd used in years.
 
All of you, thank you for the kind words and I'm glad that you agree with my assessment. I tried to be objective and it was tough forcing myself to NOT compare it to other detectors but instead to just go with it and see the results. It is easy to have a prejudiced view of any new (to me) detector if I keep thinking about my other units that I know well and process & present the target signals differently. BUT this isn't my other units so I had to forget wether I'd have dug a target or not based swinging anything else and just focus hard trying to understand the Racer. Some of the phrases I've read on this forum repeated in my head when I was using this Makro. "It'll click" , "it's like cheating" are two that kept bouncing in my brain. You guys are on to something that just flat out finds stuff where some detectors struggle. I'm still marveling at my salt water beach testing. We have a place on Cape Cod and this detector will be my night time beach hunter. Every night my wife and I share some wine on the beach and she likes looking for shells in the dark with a tactical flashlight, I like to poke around detecting because it's peaceful without the sunbathers lying on beach. I hate the stereotype of Mr. Detectorman annoying the sunbathers so I'm in the water daytime, annoying the swimmers :yikes: LOL!
There are many places I'm going to put the racer to work for me where it should shine. More than once there was more than one target of different compositions in the hole, the Racer didn't mask out, it just reported what it saw. I've learned how to set up two of my other detectors to work well in that scenario, but the racer is tuned right out of the box for this type of duty...even with the standard coil. I hope to see more activity on this forum and I particularly like reading and discussing the tech side of metal detectors.
Thanks for the feedback on my observations.
HH - Bruce
 
Hi Bruce from Down Under In Tasmania an island off the coast of Australia. Do you think the Racer has better advantages over the v3i working over wet sand. Also to me reading your report the v is better if you want to cherry pick for just certain items. Thanks for a good breakdown on the Racer.

regards Below2doe.
 
below2doe said:
Hi Bruce from Down Under In Tasmania an island off the coast of Australia. Do you think the Racer has better advantages over the v3i working over wet sand. Also to me reading your report the v is better if you want to cherry pick for just certain items. Thanks for a good breakdown on the Racer.

regards Below2doe.
Nice to hear from you. To be honest in the 4 years my V3i has been my general purpose and #1 detector I have never even tried it at the ocean beach on the wet sand. I'd always show up with a water detector like my CZ21, Excalibur. Or If I'm not going to get wet or I am winter beach hunting the Sovereign GT is what I used. That will change because I want to test the V there for comparison and just to have that knowledge under my belt. I've taken many other detectors to try to in that environment. I expect a decent showing from the V at the beach, better than my old DFX that I did use on occasional there. There is a large park and campgrounds attached to a beach that I did well with the V3i in salt compensate when I was only 100 yards from the water. It had punch. The soil was sandy, mineralized and contained salt and it was much better in salt comp on than without. I need to get down to the wet sand especially and see how it does. If it is as good as the Makro Racer I'll be pleased.
As for cherry picking the V has it down. If you use and know it then you can determine the likely alloy in pinpoint combined with the other target information it provides.
HH - Bruce
 
I agree almost 100%, Tom, and the only difference is that the month before I started using its cousin model, the Nokta FORS CoRe, and it struck me the very same way with both the standard 7X11 DD and the little 'OOR' DD coils. Once I saw how deadly and efficient the FORS CoRe was, I had very high hopes for similar performance from the Makro Racer. To me, the Racer/'OOR' combination is a must-have for many people who hunt densely trashed sites.

Monte
 
Great job on the assessment, Bruce. You really put the Racer to the test. A good hunt too. Some of the downside things you site are only true for someone who is new to the Racer though. What I like most about this machine is it's low conductor sensitivity--it just needs to be harnessed and unleashed on the gold! It's true that some of these low conductors (foils) will jump up to ID higher and that some iron will "wrap around" but these are also by-products of the Racers greatest strength--its sensitivity and "see-though" ability in iron. Both can be mediated with practice, lowered Gain settings (to begin with) and some old-school target testing methods. I'm sure that as you use the detector more your accuracy and ability to reject objects like wire and small iron will improve. Really enjoyed the read-- thank you..
cjc
 
Monte & Clive I more than appreciate your feedback. I will follow the advice and tips in Clive's book when my copy arrives. Just knowing my initial impressions are shared is the best positive reinforcement .
HH - Bruce
 
Ytcoinshooter said:
Monte & Clive I more than appreciate your feedback. I will follow the advice and tips in Clive's book when my copy arrives. Just knowing my initial impressions are shared is the best positive reinforcement .
HH - Bruce

Cherish that book.
 
Top