Bandit, is your objective, from this video, to show that there might be a learnable difference between aluminum (or specifically only aluminum pulltabs?) and gold? If so, I'm going to have to agree with Erik, that it's not going to happen. Oh sure: you might discern a difference between all the different targets in your sample set of various rings and aluminum there. Sure. But SO TOO will there be differences between each gold ring, to all other gold rings. And so too will there be infinate differences between various types of pulltabs. Some have the beaver tail pulled off, others have the beaver tail bent half way. Others have the beaver tail bent fully flat with it, etc... Various soda manufacturers have various sizes and densities and shapes of tabs. And of course, foil wads and can slaw will come in infinate sites and shapes, right? So too is gold jewelry formed in infinate sizes and shapes.
I know it's tempting to try to think we can learn the difference (because no one wants to dig junk), but all you will ever do, is learn the sound difference between two items you happen to be holding, at that exact time, in your hand. Once you get out in the field, ...... the harsh realities kick in.
About the only thing you can do, is ring enhancement programs. That's not telling gold apart from aluminum though. It's only telling you what items might be commonly recurring aluminum junk items. Like square tabs of the same brand soda (assuming not bent, split, tilted, etc...) would read about the same. Same for like-brand round tabs, you can start to mentally pass *just* that one signature, assuming it's the same size/shape tab, etc... But be assured, by doing this, you WILL miss gold that fell into that range/tone/sound, and you WILL dig junk.
You might want to read the thread from a week or so ago, where the same subject was talked about in regard to the Tony Diana CD.