... you certainly have missed the point under discussion. In your first post you state "wait till your MXT insists that a beer can is a quarter." As I mentioned, because a quarter and a beer can have the same net discrimination characteristics, EVERY DISCRIMINATING DETECTOR MADE will "see" them as the same, whether using audio or visual ID. If you use enough discrimination to accept a quarter, you will also accept the flattened can; if you use enough discrimination to reject the quarter, the flattened can will be rejected, too. ALL VDI meter will see them as the same, too. That's real life in the metal detecting world. Also in your first post, because an MXT will properly ID a can as a quarter, you suggest "trading it in." How do you figure that the MXT is "flawed" because it WORKS PROPERLY? That makes no sense at all! In your second post you suggest that, instead of my MXT, I should get a detector with BOTH "sound ID and visual ID." Gosh, MY MXT has both "sound ID and visual ID;" didn't yours? Or did you miss taking note of that? In your third post you state that the "MXT isn't accurate enough to distinguish between a dime, quarter, a nugget, or a beer can." Yes, it can distinguish between a dime and a quarter; but, if a can, and the right-sized nugget, and a quarter all ID EXACTLY THE SAME, then certainly, the MXT IS working correctly. Got that? As far as me "trading my MXT in for a Fisher-Price," sorry, buddy, that WON'T happen. My MXT, and my GMT, make me too much money for that! Yesterday I opened escrow on yet another rental/investment house, purchased with cash, derived from my involvement with metal detecting. My six rental/investment properties, purchased from money derived from metal detecting, are worth some $300,000.00. That's the kind of thing that results from using the best metal detectors on the market. How many rental houses has your detector expertise bought you? Best wishes, and HH jim