You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
goodmore said:From the Safari to the CTX all of them get right around the same depth. I would think the Equinox needs to compete with the Safari and Etrac or it is a failure out of the gate.
goodmore said:It will have the same bells and whistles as the lower end FBS units. It will have right around the same size stock coil. When I say depth I am talking about useable depth. Unusable isn't really worth mentioning is IT? IN fact I am not sure what unusable depth is. If the detector beeps dig it up. It isn't rocket science. If the Equinox can't compete with a 12 year old Etrac then it is indeed a failure out of the box. Sorry if that upsets you. In fact I see the Etrac and Safari being eliminated in the product line. Probably the 705 too. We now have access to 40 kHz without changing coils. Why bother with the old.models at all? IN fact I'll go out on a limb with another bold prediction. The CTX will have to drop to 1500.00 retail to survive. GPS and a few different colered dots are not worth the price difference. The first detectors the Equinox is making obsolete is Minelabs own product line. If it can't do it nobody will buy it.
Architex said:Unless it turns out to be another Go Find or Gold Monster.