You can prove answers to your own question with a simple bench test. Set up the detector and sweep a dime about 6 inches under the coil at what you would consider a "normal" sweep speed. Now, continue sweeping the dime under the coil, speeding up your sweep with each pass. With the 6000 series, as you speed up, you will find the target audio stays strong and will likely get stronger. Move the dime farther away from the coil and notice that faster speeds will allow you to increase the depth of detection.
Now that your arm is tired, start again at your "normal" sweep speed. This time, slow down the sweep speed with each pass under the coil. You will find that you must move the dime closer to the coil to maintain a target audio tone. Eventually, when you get real slow movement, you will not get a target signal. In fact, you will be able to stop the dime directly under the coil and not get a response.
The analog detector that comes to mind as being the "opposite" of the 6000, as far as sweep speed, is the Fisher CZ-5. You will find that a slower sweep speed is required for it to perform as designed. When you sweep it too fast, it will miss the targets, similar to the 6000 when it is swept too slow.
Lots of factors play into this. Number of filters, tracking and coil design, to name a few. There are some great users on here that might want to take a crack at further addressing your questions. HH Randy