You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
mcb613 said:Interesting video Sube! Have you tried swapping the tab and the dime? I assume the shallower target would control the signal?
Thx,
Mikw
Trashfinder said:Would be interesting to see that same test with say a F75 small coil or Nokta fors core with 5 in coil, a friend of mine has been using the small coil on his nokta and recovering a lot of silver in a school yard he hit hard with the ctx with stock coil.
mcb613 said:Sube, thsnks for the detailed responce. How about a quarter... How will that test go? I think the masked area would be smaller diameter, due to increase non ferrous qty.
How about a half, would the half overpower the junk target due tilo its size? Eould thing the conductive would fall and blend, as you put it???
Thx
Trashfinder said:I am sure you are right Sube, he just did not have one. I have offered to loan him my ctx 6 in coil , be interesting to see if he re hunts and can find even more with it, if he takes me up on my offer. Your test got my interest peeked up i have some other machines besides my ctx i am going to try your masking setup with them and see how they do compared to my ctx with 6 in coil.
mcb613 said:So, essentially the probability is primarily missing dimes, which in my opinion are the majority of silver targets one finds. Personally, not sure why dimes... Is it because they were smaller snd more easily lost, or was it dur to a dime being worth more, at the time and more prevelant? I guess one could do a quick look at mintage for any particular timeframe.
Thx