Picketwire
Well-known member
Looking at some of my finds there are amazing things that show the intelligence, ingenuity, forethought, engineering prowess, and even love of man, even in things like a stray gear from an old watch or beautiful work on jewelry or even an arrowhead. Look at the Mona Lisa, it is obvious that this was not some accident of nature. Much thought has gone into the situation of whether something was made by man or is naturally occurring but they conclude that because something show intelligence, it is man made, right? It wasn't made by some nuclear explosion because nature does not act that way. Then I see a beautiful young couple with a baby on a walk in front of my house and I think, wow, that great cosmic explosion that started from nothing but blew up into everything physical is a great explanation as to how they got here. I am kidding of course but modern "scientists" are not. If I found a computer in the ground, I can be sure it comes from an intelligent source. But to think that mankind (or humankind if you prefer) made of 60% water and thousands to billions time more complicated than this computer just happened by random mutations, to me anyway, takes way more faith than to believe that Something with intelligence so great that I cannot understand did it. Does that make me a "science denier"?
