Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

M6 vs classic id

B

Bill_S

Well-known member
How does the M6 compare to the classic ID in performance as far as depth and target seperation in trashy areas. How would a Mr. Bill modified classic ID compare? I know the M6 has more features but depth wise are they comparable. Thanks.
 
I believe the M6 would do a little better job overall. The M6 like the MXT has a faster recovery speed and a lot better ground tracking or ground balance circuitry. This circuitry will auto track the ground or it can be locked after proper balancing for certain situations like high amounts of small iron trash. The Classic ID has a fixed ground balance which could handy cap it in certain ground conditions compared to the M6. Also the M6 has a better ID meter than the Classic ID which gives a lot more information to help analyze whether to dig or not. Also I think the M6 will get a little more depth than the Classic ID because of its better ground tracking circuitry.

Just my two cents there both great detectors.

Take Care,
Bill G
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top