JASONSPAZ1
New member
If I posted this question in the specific forum for each of these detectors I could predict the responses. I will try to articulate this as best as possible rather than asking generally which machine is better. I have a Sovereign GT and before that I had the Explorer SE. I got rid of the Explorer SE due to the fact that I hated navigating menu within menus to make an adjustment. Plus I thought that the Explorer SE was to slow for some of the junk sites I hunt. I think the Sovereign GT has better target separation than that of the Explorer SE and obviously it is easier to see what the settings are at all times on the Sovereign GT. However with the Explorer and the FBS technology (which I miss)I could tell that it hit harder and deeper on silver. Especially the small Spanish 1/4 reales. Now to me the Safari has just the right amount of menus to navigate serving up just the basics (ie) threshold, sensitivity, volume, etc etc. Plus I like the idea of being able to switch disc settings on the fly. The Sovereign GT drives me nuts with can slaw, and the small nip liquor bottle caps. Plus having the pinpoint switch under the arm rest is a pain to get to on the fly. I want to know if any of you have gone from a SOV GT to a Safari and do you regret it. Can I expect the same general performance from a safari as far as coin depth when compared to the Explorer SE or the E-Trac for that matter. And Lastly Since the Sovereign has the iron mask feature and the Safari does not, does that mean the Safari is more susceptible to iron trash than the GT was. Is the response and recovery time of a Safari faster than the Explorer SE and the Sovereign. Thanks so much in advance for any comments
Take Care
HH
Jason
Take Care
HH
Jason