A
Anonymous
Guest
I am trying to get this macro thing down. I know the camera can do better than this. Would I have better luck with a tripod?
Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
A
Anonymous
Guest
[No message]
A
Anonymous
Guest
Just took these in the yard. This is sorta fun <IMG SRC="/forums/images/biggrin.gif" BORDER=0 ALT="
">
">
A
Anonymous
Guest
If you can flip that camera to aperture priority and then choose a smaller aperture your depth of field would be better and sharper.
A
Anonymous
Guest
I went hiking last night and when I got way out in the woods I tried to take a picture of a bunch of mad ants on a ant hill. I looked at my camera and saw that I did not have a disk in it. Bummer <IMG SRC="/forums/images/frown.gif" BORDER=0 ALT="">
">
A
Anonymous
Guest
btw, a smaller aperture is a higher number i.e aperture 5.6 is more open than aperture 11 or 16.
Choose something around 11 or 16.....
Choose something around 11 or 16.....
A
Anonymous
Guest
I love the macro stuff and I'm looking forward to seeing how my new Nikon 885 matches up...It has a great macro too...supposed to be able to get to 4cm..(1.6inches)..I think that's damn close for this cam!