A
Anonymous
Guest
How can so many people get so excited by the ACE 250? Someone said in their post, 'you never can have enough metal detectors.'
I spent a bunch of money for my GTI2500 + $500 for a periscope P.I. detector to confirm the identity of the object and help precisely locate it's position in the ground.
Now I read of people thrilled over the ACE 250 costing less than a fourth of the price of my main detector. I even found myself remarking to my wife that I was begining to think I'd like to try one myself.
That sounds absolutely CRAZY. Isn't MY GTI2500 with it's 5x10" eliptical, 9.5" imaging, and 12.5" imaging coils superior to all other Garretts? I started with a Treasure Ace 200 which I traded for a GTA 350 which I seldom use: why use an inferior metal detector?
Or do the different computers that go with the other well spoken of detectors give each a different "personality" -- capable of doing stuff the others won't, although the raw data from the search coils are basically the same?
Are there some Garretts better for some search jobs than others?
If I'm tempted to try another detector, shouldn't I be saving my money for a truly different KIND of detector -- like the Inifinitum? Maybe I should try the Fisher CZ-70?
I'm just like any other fisherman (of the ground) -- happy to have anything interesting, especially old stuff. My ambition is to get down to Tennessee and find a mini-ball. I live in N.W. Indiana.
After 4.5 years at this, all I've found so far are various form of "junk" -- some rings(none very valuable, I think,) toys, nothing spactacular, a 1918 penny is the oldest coin -- 14 silver coins (2 standing liberty quarters) and 44 wheat pennys.
I WOULD like to grow in my only retirement hobby, but am unsure if the direction I should take is to work the GTI2500 more intensively and concentrate perhaps on better places to hunt?
Or maybe using a different VLF machine would give me more perspective in the sport. Should I use the GTA 350 more? Is the Yeller machine a wasteful diversion?
I spent a bunch of money for my GTI2500 + $500 for a periscope P.I. detector to confirm the identity of the object and help precisely locate it's position in the ground.
Now I read of people thrilled over the ACE 250 costing less than a fourth of the price of my main detector. I even found myself remarking to my wife that I was begining to think I'd like to try one myself.
That sounds absolutely CRAZY. Isn't MY GTI2500 with it's 5x10" eliptical, 9.5" imaging, and 12.5" imaging coils superior to all other Garretts? I started with a Treasure Ace 200 which I traded for a GTA 350 which I seldom use: why use an inferior metal detector?
Or do the different computers that go with the other well spoken of detectors give each a different "personality" -- capable of doing stuff the others won't, although the raw data from the search coils are basically the same?
Are there some Garretts better for some search jobs than others?
If I'm tempted to try another detector, shouldn't I be saving my money for a truly different KIND of detector -- like the Inifinitum? Maybe I should try the Fisher CZ-70?
I'm just like any other fisherman (of the ground) -- happy to have anything interesting, especially old stuff. My ambition is to get down to Tennessee and find a mini-ball. I live in N.W. Indiana.
After 4.5 years at this, all I've found so far are various form of "junk" -- some rings(none very valuable, I think,) toys, nothing spactacular, a 1918 penny is the oldest coin -- 14 silver coins (2 standing liberty quarters) and 44 wheat pennys.
I WOULD like to grow in my only retirement hobby, but am unsure if the direction I should take is to work the GTI2500 more intensively and concentrate perhaps on better places to hunt?
Or maybe using a different VLF machine would give me more perspective in the sport. Should I use the GTA 350 more? Is the Yeller machine a wasteful diversion?