Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Is there a consensus here on ground mineralization numbers?

A

Anonymous

Guest
Are 50s numbers mild? Upper 60s High? 80s- very high mineralization? How accurate are these numbers?
A curious non-MXT user
George
 
My MXT does just fine even in this extreme mineralization in the gold fields. I even have the 18" DD Excelerator and it's quiet. So different from the noisy higher frequency GMT.
But the small shooter coil is the best and I can crank up the gain to the maximum. Great depth on that little coil!
Still haven't found a nugget though,just lots of bullets.
Randy
 
I will be in AZ,Tx & NM in January, to look for GOLD, I have the shooter coil, stock coil, do I need the new whites larger dd coil?
 
.... the coils you have will be fine, but, compared to stock 950, the big 14" DD will give you greater depth, greater ground coverage, especially at depth, and yet will still find those small "Mojave Midget" nuggets. With my MXT, fitted with the 14" DD, in Mojave Desert soil which averages 79 to 84 (I have a few "hotter" spots then my friend Randy Seden) I can still find 1/2 grainers with no problem. Hope this helps; HH Jim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top