I've been reading field reports and posts about the various CZ machines, trying to decide which one to get, and have been heavily leaning towards the CZ3D as I'm mainly looking for a unit to hunt old coins. Initially this lead me to believe the CZ3D was the way to go, but today I read a Field Test review from Lost Treasure on the CZ70 Pro and they pointed out that on the CZ70 Pro added a fourth tone/target ID specifically for old coins/relics which is I believe what FRL also did on the CZ3D. The same sites review on the CZ-70 Pro stated that "Realizing that detectorists could significantly benefit from the addition of a fourth (old coin/relic) audio identification tone and the additional visual target category provided by it. Fisher has recently introduced a new detector model, the CZ-70 Pro QuickSilver, which now incorporates a 4-tone audio identification system with corresponding meter indication. "
The CZ-70 Pro features a 4-tone audio I.D. system that produces a low tone (200Hz) for iron targets, a mid tone (450 Hz) for foil and tab I.D., a mid/high tone (800Hz) for old coin/relic I.D. and a high tone (1 kHz) for coin I.D.
The CZ-3D features a 4-tone audio I.D. system that produces a 200 Hz Iron, 350 Hz Foil, 450 Hz Tabs and 1 KHz Coin I.D. tone.
It seems to me that the CZ-70 Pro is almost better suited (at least on paper) for old coin hunting then the CZ3D, am I way off base here ?
Any pros or cons for the CZ3D over the CZ70 Pro, or vice versa ?
Thanks and happy hunting,
Brian
The CZ-70 Pro features a 4-tone audio I.D. system that produces a low tone (200Hz) for iron targets, a mid tone (450 Hz) for foil and tab I.D., a mid/high tone (800Hz) for old coin/relic I.D. and a high tone (1 kHz) for coin I.D.
The CZ-3D features a 4-tone audio I.D. system that produces a 200 Hz Iron, 350 Hz Foil, 450 Hz Tabs and 1 KHz Coin I.D. tone.
It seems to me that the CZ-70 Pro is almost better suited (at least on paper) for old coin hunting then the CZ3D, am I way off base here ?
Any pros or cons for the CZ3D over the CZ70 Pro, or vice versa ?
Thanks and happy hunting,
Brian