is f75 se the most powerful detector on the market.

[jmann]

Ive heard this said on utube is there any valitity in this claim in you alls opinion?

 

[jmann]

Not sure why this one got moved. Its a fisher f series. But sorry any how for not putting it in the right spot.

 

[Critterhunter]

n/t

 

[Finder82]

Well, the answer have to be no.

 

[Elton]

No more no less on the move..

 

[Critterhunter]

Since there's a more open policy about comparisons on here these days, I'll only say this. The F75LTD or T2SE are (from what I've read) deep detectors in good soil, but have some problems with mineralized soils compared to some other detectors. That's just what I've read, though. I was seriously considering a T2SE for a while but after researching this I decided it might not work as well in my soil. Great detectors, though. Probably in the top 5 as far as performance goes depending on how you rate certain things.

 

[matthias]

I had a Fisher F75 LTD SE and it was incredible except that I couldn't keep it stable in my soil conditions. Very sweet machine anyway. HH. Matt

 

[Utuk_Xul]

I have highly mineralized soil. Saturated with black sand and the T2 is the only detector I've had that can handle it without losing a lot of depth. The T2 ground balances in the upper 80's to mid 90's here...and the fe3o4 meter is pegged. With most detectors I could only get 4" on a quarter before it shifted over to a solid iron signal. The T2 can hit it well over 7". Not a solid signal mind you... but it isn't bouncing into the iron at least. I've previously had an ACE250, MXT, a Minelab X-Terra 705 and a few others. So I believe the T2 does better than most in soils that have lots of magnetite at least.